CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Overset Grids

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 29, 2003, 05:46
Default Overset Grids
  #1
Anton Lyaskin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

Can anybody point a basic reference on Overset Grids?

Thanks in advance!

Anton
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2003, 12:31
Default Re: Overset Grids
  #2
Selina Tracy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Actually, I am also interested in the overset grid. I heard that it enjoys freedom of unstructured grid while having some of advantages from structured grid.

I have a book "Handbook of grid generation" by Thompson. Check the chapter 11. "Composite overset structured grid"

-Selina
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2003, 21:53
Default Re: Overset Grids
  #3
greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Two of the more basic references that I have used in the past are

"On the Use of Composite Grid Schemes in Computational Aerodynamics", Steger & Benek, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Nos. 1-3, 301-320, 1987.

"On the Spatial and Temporal Accuracy of Overset Grid Methods for Moving Body Problems", Meakin, AIAA-94-1925.

Most of the textbooks in CFD that I have don't really spend a great deal of time covering overset methods and some of the subtleties involved. There are usually a number of papers presented at the AIAA conferences that utilize overset grids in various applications, and there is an overset grid symposium that meets bi-annually. The most recent one was held this past October - a Google search on 'overset grid symposium' will return a host of results such as

http://www.arl.hpc.mil/Overset2002/

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2003, 01:36
Default Re: Overset Grids
  #4
Anton Lyaskin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Selina, Greg!

What I want to know about the overset grid methods are their advantages and disadvantages for the moving body problems. For example, what methods are used for interpolation and what are the computational expences comparing with rearrangement of the traditional "one piece" grid?
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2003, 05:59
Default Re: Overset Grids
  #5
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is probably the best place to start:

http://www.llnl.gov/casc/Overture/

The best reference is probably the J.Comp.Phys. paper from 1990 discussing interpolation.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2003, 09:17
Default Re: Overset Grids
  #6
ag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For moving bodies, overset grids make it very easy to introduce relative motion between bodies in flow. The individual bodies have their own sets of grids which are moved along with the body and no grid deformation or regridding needs to be considered (although it could be included within the overall framework - some work is currently being done on modeling aeroelastic problems using overset grids). So you grid once at the start and that's all the grid generation that is required. The price you pay is in the grid assembly process, where the individual grids are pieced togeether into a composite grid system and the grid connectivity information is established, and in the possible degradation of information passage across interpolation boundaries. The grid assembly process is not automatic, regardless of what anyone says. It has been made much better of late with codes like PEGSUS 5, but it does require a certain amount of experience to obtain good composite grids. Most of this experience really comes from knowing what kinds of grids to generate initially that will give good composite characteristics when fed into the assembly process. It's not difficult but it can be tedious and there is a learning curve. Interpolation is typically trilinear (at least for structured grids, which is primarily where overset grids are used currently. Some work is being done to extend the methods to overset grids). Because of this there has been an ongoing debate about loss of conservation at overset grid interfaces. Most of these difficulties can be avoided if the grid regions that overlap have similar cell sizes, but that again requires a little experience to be able to do well. There is also an issue with the propagation of signals across grids with disparate cell sizes, and problems of transferring gradients across interpolation boundaries, i.e. interpolating information from boundary layers. In short, overset grid methods are very robust methods for handling moving bodies if the practitioner is aware of some of the issues involved and can account for them.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CHIMERA OVERSET GRIDS Jeff Main CFD Forum 0 February 15, 2008 12:53
A question about dynamic overset grids JXIA Main CFD Forum 4 January 10, 2008 04:50
Help for 3 overlapping grids in overset Ben Main CFD Forum 0 July 6, 2007 23:53
overset grids Khalid Main CFD Forum 0 March 31, 2002 05:16
Boundary Conditions for LU-SGS Method Based on Overset Grids Aiming Yang Main CFD Forum 1 April 25, 2000 04:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39.