# Flow through a regenerator

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 19, 2003, 04:31 Flow through a regenerator #1 Pete I Guest   Posts: n/a I have a problem that I am looking at, basically I am looking at flow through regenerators (Heat Exchangers). This basically consist of 500 layers of fine steel mesh packed into a tube 40mm long. A lot of the work I have seen assumes that due to the 'flow straightening' characteristics, I can assume the flow through this mesh is Laminar. I'm not so sure? The query is with respect to looking at pressure drops. Could I analyse the pressure drop of say 1/10th of the length and by analogy just sum up to get the full length pressure drop. I know that Fluent has porous material analysis, does anyone know how the analysis works?

 June 20, 2003, 11:56 Re: Flow through a regenerator #2 Wei Rong Guest   Posts: n/a You are on sth which I am working on now.I assume flow though regenerator laminar because the reynolds based on hydraulic diameter is 800 or so. There do exsist some debate about the flow pattern and which model should be used under certain reynolds number. I did CFD modeling and experiment both , the pressure drop agrees well as laminar model applies. I use CFDRC. You can treat with 1/10 then by analogy sum up to the full length. No clue about the "flow straightening". The real trick lies in heat transfer in porous media. I am really getting pain with CFD commercial packages when heat transfer is introduced. Hope above all can help you

 June 22, 2003, 02:08 Re: Flow through a regenerator #3 Rami Guest   Posts: n/a Most HT models use the form Nu=c * Re^m * Pr^n, where Nu, Re and Pr are Nusselt, Reynolds and Pradtl numbers, and c, m and n are the corellation coefficients, which differ depending on the porous medium microstructure and the flow regime. The closest case to yours I had simulated was flow through a honeycomb (which indeed straightens the flow along the honeycomb cells). Therefore, the case is similar to flow and HT in pipes, and correlations may be found in standard textbooks (e.g., M.N. Ozisik, Heat Transfer: A Basic Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1985). For turbulent flow (Re>10,000, 0.760) I applied Dittus-Boetler correlation (c=0.023, m=0.4, n=0.3 for cooling or 0.4 for heating). When the flow is laminar, Nu is constant in my case. For square-cell honeycomb it is Nu=2.976 (see Ozisik). I hope this helps, Rami

 July 1, 2003, 08:09 Re: Flow through a regenerator #4 Steve Guest   Posts: n/a It is interesting topic. Do you have some publishes can be offered in here?

 July 1, 2003, 08:25 Re: Flow through a regenerator #5 Rami Guest   Posts: n/a Steve, If you meant whether we published this (in the context of flow through a honeycomb, which - in my case - is a part of a solar receiver) - unfortunately not yet (only in internal reports). However, this is rather standard treatment of pipe flow, as mentioned in my former posting.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33 alexandrepereira OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 August 25, 2010 17:35 James Main CFD Forum 6 May 15, 2009 12:14 curious ... Main CFD Forum 23 July 21, 2006 07:40 pxyz Main CFD Forum 37 July 7, 2006 08:42

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:21.