CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Flow through a regenerator

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2003, 04:31
Default Flow through a regenerator
  #1
Pete I
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have a problem that I am looking at, basically I am looking at flow through regenerators (Heat Exchangers). This basically consist of 500 layers of fine steel mesh packed into a tube 40mm long. A lot of the work I have seen assumes that due to the 'flow straightening' characteristics, I can assume the flow through this mesh is Laminar. I'm not so sure? The query is with respect to looking at pressure drops. Could I analyse the pressure drop of say 1/10th of the length and by analogy just sum up to get the full length pressure drop. I know that Fluent has porous material analysis, does anyone know how the analysis works?
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2003, 11:56
Default Re: Flow through a regenerator
  #2
Wei Rong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You are on sth which I am working on now.I assume flow though regenerator laminar because the reynolds based on hydraulic diameter is 800 or so. There do exsist some debate about the flow pattern and which model should be used under certain reynolds number. I did CFD modeling and experiment both , the pressure drop agrees well as laminar model applies. I use CFDRC.

You can treat with 1/10 then by analogy sum up to the full length.

No clue about the "flow straightening".

The real trick lies in heat transfer in porous media. I am really getting pain with CFD commercial packages when heat transfer is introduced.

Hope above all can help you
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2003, 02:08
Default Re: Flow through a regenerator
  #3
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Most HT models use the form Nu=c * Re^m * Pr^n, where Nu, Re and Pr are Nusselt, Reynolds and Pradtl numbers, and c, m and n are the corellation coefficients, which differ depending on the porous medium microstructure and the flow regime.

The closest case to yours I had simulated was flow through a honeycomb (which indeed straightens the flow along the honeycomb cells). Therefore, the case is similar to flow and HT in pipes, and correlations may be found in standard textbooks (e.g., M.N. Ozisik, Heat Transfer: A Basic Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1985).

For turbulent flow (Re>10,000, 0.7<Pr<160, L/d>60) I applied Dittus-Boetler correlation (c=0.023, m=0.4, n=0.3 for cooling or 0.4 for heating).

When the flow is laminar, Nu is constant in my case. For square-cell honeycomb it is Nu=2.976 (see Ozisik).

I hope this helps, Rami
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2003, 08:09
Default Re: Flow through a regenerator
  #4
Steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is interesting topic. Do you have some publishes can be offered in here?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2003, 08:25
Default Re: Flow through a regenerator
  #5
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Steve,

If you meant whether we published this (in the context of flow through a honeycomb, which - in my case - is a part of a solar receiver) - unfortunately not yet (only in internal reports). However, this is rather standard treatment of pipe flow, as mentioned in my former posting.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow meter Design CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33
Ho to model the flow in a Regenerator alexandrepereira OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 August 25, 2010 17:35
What is the difference between liquid reactive flow and gas reactive flow? James Main CFD Forum 6 May 15, 2009 12:14
potential flow vs. Euler flow curious ... Main CFD Forum 23 July 21, 2006 07:40
transform navier-stokes eq. to euler-eq. pxyz Main CFD Forum 37 July 7, 2006 08:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:44.