flow across sphere at Re=10,000

raheelrasool · April 14, 2009, 00:28

Good Day,

I am trying to simulate flow over a sphere(using water 998.2 kg/cubic m) at Re=10,000 (V=0.01005 m/s) using Fluent. The following is my simulational setup:

unsteady LES with dynamic smagorinsky model
PISO (pressure velocity coupling)
standard pressure discretization and second order upwind for momentum and energy
time step size is 19.9005 sec (based upon assumed St=0.2, giving 25 steps in one cycle)

The problem is that my drag convergence history is a bit offset from those calculated by other people. Its a bit high, varying between 0.5~0.4 whereas it should be in the range of 0.42~0.37
I would be greatful if somebody can guide me in this regard.
Best Regards,
Raheel

sbaffini · April 14, 2009, 04:03

Second order upwind is not a good choice when performing LES. The Bounded Central Scheme is the suggested one for LES simulations, for momentum and energy.

Also, the time step should be calculated from the Re number. Actually, when performing LES, it is assumed that time filtering is not present so the time step should be chosen following this reasoning (probably a courant number less than 1 is a safe condition). Obviously, the grid spacing should be selected in the same way.

Finally, i'd choose NITA- Fractional Step instead of PISO and the PRESTO! interpolation instead of the Standard one.

fudhail · April 14, 2009, 05:11

hi all,

I want to simulate turbulent in pipe flow. Could you guys give me some references so that i can validate my data. Thanks in advanve.

raheelrasool · April 19, 2009, 22:31

Thanx Paolo for your suggestions. I applied the suggested modifications and the results are much better now.

Thanx Again...

April 14, 2009, 00:28	flow across sphere at Re=10,000	#1
raheelrasool New Member Raheel Rasool Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 17	Good Day, I am trying to simulate flow over a sphere(using water 998.2 kg/cubic m) at Re=10,000 (V=0.01005 m/s) using Fluent. The following is my simulational setup: unsteady LES with dynamic smagorinsky model PISO (pressure velocity coupling) standard pressure discretization and second order upwind for momentum and energy time step size is 19.9005 sec (based upon assumed St=0.2, giving 25 steps in one cycle) The problem is that my drag convergence history is a bit offset from those calculated by other people. Its a bit high, varying between 0.5~0.4 whereas it should be in the range of 0.42~0.37 I would be greatful if somebody can guide me in this regard. Best Regards, Raheel

April 14, 2009, 05:11	turbulent pipe flow	#3
fudhail New Member fudhail Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0	hi all, I want to simulate turbulent in pipe flow. Could you guys give me some references so that i can validate my data. Thanks in advanve.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Flow past a sphere	Fabio	FLUENT	23	December 18, 2009 15:32
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows?	diaw	Main CFD Forum	104	February 16, 2006 05:44
Modeling diffusion of cell (sphere) under flow	Shel	Main CFD Forum	0	August 22, 2005 15:26
3D sphere flow	MH Kim	Main CFD Forum	1	August 8, 2005 17:06
meshing F1 front wing	Steve	FLUENT	0	April 17, 2003 12:37

April 14, 2009, 04:03		#2
sbaffini Senior Member Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 2,152 Blog Entries: 29 Rep Power: 39	Second order upwind is not a good choice when performing LES. The Bounded Central Scheme is the suggested one for LES simulations, for momentum and energy. Also, the time step should be calculated from the Re number. Actually, when performing LES, it is assumed that time filtering is not present so the time step should be chosen following this reasoning (probably a courant number less than 1 is a safe condition). Obviously, the grid spacing should be selected in the same way. Finally, i'd choose NITA- Fractional Step instead of PISO and the PRESTO! interpolation instead of the Standard one.

April 19, 2009, 22:31		#4
raheelrasool New Member Raheel Rasool Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 17	Thanx Paolo for your suggestions. I applied the suggested modifications and the results are much better now. Thanx Again...