|April 15, 2009, 10:47||
Problems with Launder and Sharma model
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
I have problems with Launder and Sharma (LS) model when calculating backward-facing step (BFS) problem.
I am not using CFD software, but the whole model is coded in Fortran. With LS model I already solved 2D channel flow at different Reynolds numbers (low and high) and everything seems to work fine (when comparing with experiments and DNS results).
For BFS, the geometry and flow conditions are taken from experiment by
Jović and Driver, where the Re, based on the step height, is 5000.
The calculated reattachment position is agreed very well with the
experiment. But velocities near the bottom wall are wrong, and also the wall shear stress. Here is the link of the picture with wall shear stress along the bottom wall:
"http://www.p-ng.si/~vertnik/wall shear stress.jpg".
If there is someone, or was having similar problems, to help me out
finding the error?
Similar BFS problem was calculated for laminar flow at Re=800. The wall shear stress is perfect when compared with other authors.
So there must be problem with turbulence model? Can someone explain me, how this extra source terms in LS turbulent model, D in k-equation and E in e-equation, are calculated?
Thank for you answers,
|May 20, 2009, 11:40||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 55Rep Power: 8
Launder-Sharma model is best suited for flat plate zero pressure gradient flow. For backward facing step use other models such as k-w or SST. Following paper is a good reference,
|backward-facing step, launder and sharma|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|HELP URGENT: model turbulent LAUNDER SHARMA||dory||FLUENT||3||August 5, 2000 19:18|
|turbulent model , free convection||DORY||Main CFD Forum||3||August 5, 2000 17:01|
|Low Re k-e model bound. conds||Abhijit Tilak||Main CFD Forum||1||October 7, 1999 05:31|
|Launder & Sharma model in combusion case||Richard Carroni||Main CFD Forum||1||November 17, 1998 19:59|