# Using filters on NS equation for LES

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 15, 2009, 14:14 Using filters on NS equation for LES #1 Member   vishwanath somashekar Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 41 Rep Power: 9 Hi, I am vishwa and am very new to LES. I use fluent for my simulation. My first question is how does the filtering operation work when we talk about resolved scales and subgrid scales. In fluent, i read that the filtered variable phi_bar(x) = integral_volume(phi(x')G(x,x')dx_prime where is G is the filter function and in FlUENT G = 1/V*integral_volume(phi(x')dx', x' belongs to V What does it actually mean.. Can anyone of you explain with an example.? Regards, vishwa

 April 15, 2009, 16:12 #2 Senior Member   N/A Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 189 Rep Power: 9 If you are not using dynamic models and since you are not explicitly filtering your data it may not mean anything for your numerical simulation. For details of LES, have a look at Pope or Saigaut or browse through the forum for exhaustive discussions on LES filters.

 April 16, 2009, 03:05 #3 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 573 Blog Entries: 14 Rep Power: 18 What it actually means is that fluent does not perform any explicit filtering and assumes that the volume average per each cell (because the code is a finite volume solver) acts as an implicit filter, which is in fact the case. This means that the filtering is not actually performed but assumed to be the result of the Finite Volume discretization. However, in fluent the truncation error is of the same order of any of the LES models implemented so the use of any model is, at least, questionable. Actually, when the finite volume approach is used as an implicit filtering in a consistent way (of course it's not the fluent case), the subgrid-scale stress tensor is not in its usual form as written in the books. Moreover, the same dynamic procedure turns out to be different because of this. Because all these parts are 2nd order terms (as the truncation error), in fluent nothing is actually done and the equations solved are the same of the URANS equations but with a different turbulent model (actually a very simple one). So the biggest part of the job is up to you: choosing a proper grid, time step and a centered convective scheme. Then just pick up the LES turbulent model and go.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27 Rafal Main CFD Forum 4 November 29, 2006 10:27 Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02 zhou FLUENT 0 February 24, 2004 00:55 izardy amiruddin Main CFD Forum 2 July 4, 2002 08:14

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25.