CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

low reynolds number models in Fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 16, 2009, 16:29
Default low reynolds number models in Fluent
  #1
Member
 
Doug Hunsaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
doug is on a distinguished road
I have two questions:

1. Does the term "low Reynolds number model" mean that the model is only good for low Reynolds number flows? Or does it mean that it is a modification capable of handling both hi and low Reynolds number flows?

2. When I run fluent using periodic boundary conditions and either the Lam Bremhorst (index 1) or Launder Sharma (index 2) model at a Reynolds number of 10,000 the kinetic energy eventually goes to zero across the channel, and I get a laminar solution. Any ideas why that might be? This does not happen when I run the standard k-e model with standard wall functions or the standard k-e model with "enhanced wall treatment" with periodic boundary conditions.

Thanks.

Doug
doug is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 16:47
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 8
harishg is on a distinguished road
It means that your model can be integrated upto the wall and you do not need to use any wall function. Check the value of yplus. The wall function approach requires your first grid point to be in the log layer (yplus > 30) while the low Re models requires yplus of the first grid point to be less than 5 to accurately model the near wall effects.
harishg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 17:19
Default
  #3
Member
 
Doug Hunsaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
doug is on a distinguished road
My first wall plus value is around .01 on my current grid (100x100). I've run some more cases and find that if I coarsen the grid (50x50) I get the turbulent velocity profile as expected. However, if I refine the grid (200x200) I get the laminar solution. This is opposite of my intuition which would say that coarsening the grid would give the worse result...?
doug is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 17:21
Default
  #4
Member
 
Doug Hunsaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
doug is on a distinguished road
Wait a minute. I take that back. The 200x200 grid is giving me a better velocity profile. I'll get back when I have better results.

Thanks for your help!
doug is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2009, 15:43
Default
  #5
Member
 
Doug Hunsaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
doug is on a distinguished road
Does anyone know what Fluent is using for the BCs for the low-re number models available only through the TUI? I've searched their documentation in vain to find the boundary conditions for these models. I can find them from the original literature from the models, but I'm a little wary that Fluent is fudging things near the wall...

Thanks!
doug is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2009, 10:42
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 8
neazen is on a distinguished road
About low reynolds number flow question :

Usually this term refer to specific flows such that the Reynolds number is very small so the inertia term of the Navier-Stokes equation is very small compared to the viscous forces and it is possible to neglect it. (Like for lubrification problems)
This leads to the so called (linear) Stokes equations for a viscous fluid, were the Reynolds number can be replaced by unity.
Obviously in this case the model is inappropriate to flows with high Re number.

Now the question is : does Fluent mean something else by using this term?

__________________
If a problem can be solved, there is nothing to worry about. If it can't be solved, worrying will do no good.
So be Zen and stay Zen
neazen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2012, 14:39
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Ayushi
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
asurpam is on a distinguished road
hi,
Can anyone tell me how to set periodic boundary condition for low Reynolds number flow in a pipe???
asurpam is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
low reynolds number K-epsilon model amar FLUENT 24 October 10, 2012 06:19
BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36
Implementing low Re number k-e models in Fluent. kiran FLUENT 0 October 7, 2007 18:41
Low Reynolds number flow Terje CFX 3 June 20, 2007 08:10
Low Reynolds Number Flow Computation A.M.Yang Main CFD Forum 7 January 22, 2002 13:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:47.