CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Re=300 flow over a sphere

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 14, 2003, 12:31
Default Re=300 flow over a sphere
  #1
shailesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I am simulating a Re=300 flow over a sphere. Acoording to the literature and previous numerical studies, wake at Re=300 is periodic and has shedded vortices..BUT i couldn't get any such periodicity...I read in some other papers..that at low reynolds numbers like..300..1000..flow is generally stable..and to start the vortex shedding..some perturbation has to be given..so I gave a perturbation..like multiplied the streamwise velocity in the upper half of sphere by 1.1 at some (only once) time step. Actually it seemed that it did have vortex shedding but only for some time..it couldnt be sustained and the flow is back to steady again..i am wondering what could be wrong..do i need to refine my grid more..??

regards shailesh
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2003, 13:14
Default Re: Re=300 flow over a sphere
  #2
Jim Park
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Difficulty in simulating shedding of vortices is I believe a classic problem.

If your numerical scheme (differencing or whatever) has excessive numerical dissipation, it can show up as what appears to be an artificially high viscosity - making the computational Reynolds number much less than the one intended. And, at a lower (computational) Re, the flow is non-shedding. Also, using upwind differencing with a mesh that's too coarse can have the same effect.

Take a look at some of the early (1960's!) papers by P. J. 'Pat' Roache (his book has a chapter on this stuff!) and C. W. (Tony) Hirt. Hirt's J. Comp. Physucs paper on 'Heuristic Stability Theory' shows the technique needed to analyze your algorithm.

It may be that you need only resolve your mesh (add more cells) to get a good simulation.

Good luck!
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2003, 17:42
Default Re: Re=300 flow over a sphere
  #3
shailesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jim..thanks a lot!! for the informative comment..i was thinking along the same lines
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2003, 05:47
Default Re: Re=300 flow over a sphere
  #4
versi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Simply refine your grid to see if unsteadiness occurs.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow over a sphere, wich model should i use dfmona CFX 4 June 13, 2010 17:32
Flow past a sphere Fabio FLUENT 23 December 18, 2009 16:32
flow across sphere at Re=10,000 raheelrasool Main CFD Forum 3 April 19, 2009 22:31
Modeling diffusion of cell (sphere) under flow Shel Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2005 15:26
3D sphere flow MH Kim Main CFD Forum 1 August 8, 2005 17:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00.