CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 16, 2003, 10:22
Default the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #1
Tian Baolin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear all, I am working on the subject of the simulation of Richtmyer-Meshkov instablity. The controllong equations are the compressible Euler/NS equations. At first, between the interfae there are two different fluid, which will be accelerated by a shock and then result in the so-called R-M instablity. Now, I am wondering what model I should use in my simulation. I am confused by the concept, such as multicomponent, multiphase and multifluid. So I hope someone could give me explaination about such fields. Thanks anyway!

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2003, 10:52
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #2
jdc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Tian,

I am not familiar with the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability but I may clarify the terminology multicomponent/multiphase.

- multicomponent: indicate the fluid (or liquid or solid) of interest is composed of several component. For example, air is a multicomponent gas composed essentially of O2 and N2.

- multiphase: a phase correspond to the state of the material you are investigated: gas, liquid, solid. A flow is said multiphased if it is composed of a mixing between two (or more) different phase. For example, the injection of fuel in an internal combustion engine is multiphase.

I will assume that multifluid notify if several fluid are interacting, but I am not familiar with the terminology.

Hoppe this will help. Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2003, 15:49
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #3
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Tian, What jdc said is really right but for the Richtmyer-Meshkov instablity in your case, you don't need to consider the multicomponent, multiphase or any confusive concepts. No model is needed, as long as both gases are ideal. You just treat them as a single gas! What you need to do is specifying the initial field properly and then solving the Euler system.

- Paul
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2003, 22:19
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #4
Tian Baolin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks a lot to jdc and Paul. As for my problem,the R-M instablity,I have simulated the case in which both gas are ideal and treated as a single gas. Now,I want to investigate the effect of different state equation to R-M instablity,such as the interface of Air and He, Air and SF6, with different ratio of specific heats. So I think that I have to consider such problem,such as multicomponent, multiphase or multifluid. In literatures, some multicomponent models, even multiphase models were used to simulate the R-M instablity. In my simulation, the level set method was used to tract the moving interface. Moreover,I want to study the mixture of two fluids, so I want to know whether Euler equations are enough for the mixture or not. Is it that only the full N-S equations can describe the fluid mixture, even to turbulence?

best wishes!

Tian Baolin
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2003, 23:13
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #5
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Tian, at the very beginning of your research, you can still treat any combinations - Air/He, Air/SF6 or Ar/He - as a single gas, if the ratios of specific heat are supposed to be the same. Otherwise you have to solve for the equtions for the components, but then only multicomponent model is involved. Usually one would like to avoid such situation since then many things have to considered like the diffusive rate between two components. Good luck!

-Paul
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2003, 23:36
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #6
Tian Baolin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,Paul,thanks a lot. Maybe I will have to use the multicomponent model in my work, for my PhD supervisor asked me to investigate the R-M instablity with different ratios of specific heat. And I have finished the simulation as a single gas. I plan to combine the VOF and level set method to such multicomponent problem, but now I have not got the detailed solution. I don't want to adopt the Ghost method for I think it does not include the diffusion.

Another question, the diffusion accross the interface is of importance or not? What is true physical mechanics accross interface. In my opinion,both the level set method and the front tracking method fail to describe the diffusion, right?

Tian
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2003, 13:07
Default Re: the difference of mulitcomponent,multiphase?
  #7
Dean
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It sounds like you are interested in questions that can be answered most directly by eliminating the front tracking and level sets, and going to a multicomponent treatment with the NS equations. The physics of the interface is that there is no true interface. As soon as you create a sharp interface, diffusion begins to smear it out. Whether diffusion is important depends on your length and time scales, transport coefficients and other physical parameters, and what questions you are trying to answer. Be sure to use enough resolution that numerical diffusion isn't a problem.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Periodic Boundary Condition for upwind difference yohey44 Main CFD Forum 0 October 27, 2010 13:10
paraview - plotting difference to reference data joewe ParaView 0 August 30, 2010 18:01
the effect of upwind difference hades Main CFD Forum 8 March 15, 2009 00:43
Difference between scaled residuals and... Dieter FLUENT 0 April 28, 2006 17:52
Fininte difference and Finite element Technique Mahendra Singh Mehra FLUENT 3 December 22, 2005 23:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20.