CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Finite difference can be non-conservative?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 8, 2009, 00:56
Default Finite difference can be non-conservative?
  #1
New Member
 
greg
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
gregmason is on a distinguished road
Hello
We know that finite volume methods are always locally conservative (my concern is mass only). I was wondering if that is always the case with finite difference methods too? What about for cell-centered finite difference methods in particular. Also, what if the flow being considered is in anisotropic domain, where flux is not necessarily oriented in the direction of gradient.

Thanks.
gregmason is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2009, 08:33
Default
  #2
New Member
 
M. Nabi
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 7
mnabi is on a distinguished road
for incompressible flow, in anycase, it must be conservative. It is not related to the type of discretization.
To solve the incompressible flow, people usually use the fractional step method. (Pressure correction method). At this method, the predictor gives non-conservative velocity field. But it gets corrected by the pressure correction. It is not related to the type of discretization. In all kinds of discretizations, the divergence of the velocity, must be zero. The only thing which must be considered, is the discretization of pressure poisson equation, must adapt the velocity discretization. (this problems arise in unstructured grids).
There is another method, namely artificial compressibility method. At this method, pressure correction is not necessary. by adding a term (virtual density) to the continuity equation, and solving the time dependent density. In this case, the velocity is not divergence free per iteration. But to solve time dependent problems, they iterate it per time step, until density converges to the real density. But it is still not related to the type of discretization.
Thus I suggest you to control your solver again.
mnabi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2009, 11:53
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 420
Blog Entries: 13
Rep Power: 14
sbaffini will become famous soon enough
however, finite difference schemes are not necessarily kinetic energy conserving, especially when going to higher orders. there should be several papers about this topic availables from the Stanford CTR site (by Morinishi and Vasilyev).
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
anisotropy, finite difference, finite volume, locally conservative

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite element vs. finite difference Francisco Saldarriaga Main CFD Forum 21 April 9, 2012 02:26
Finite Difference Vs. Finite Volume elankov Main CFD Forum 43 December 18, 2010 16:30
Fininte difference and Finite element Technique Mahendra Singh Mehra FLUENT 3 December 22, 2005 23:49
finite difference method for navier-stokes problem dallybird Main CFD Forum 5 February 17, 2003 22:00
Conservative finite difference scheme? Linfeng BI Main CFD Forum 1 October 10, 2002 12:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18.