CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

the question about validate code

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 9, 2003, 07:24
Default the question about validate code
  #1
Bin Li
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i run the code of compressible N-S equations, and compare the results with incompressible ones because of low Mach number, about 0.2. is it right? Re=3900 ,cylinder.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2003, 10:27
Default Re: the question about validate code
  #2
P. Birken
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have never done such comparisons, but you should go lower with your Mach number. What "they" say is that low Mach starts at 0.1. You have to be careful though, when the Mach number becomes too small, most compressible codes produce false result, especially false pressure distributions.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2003, 12:05
Default Re: the question about validate code
  #3
ag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Actually flow can be considered essentially incompressible up to a Mach number of ~0.3. You can show this very simply (and get a bound on your error) by doing a Taylor series expansion of the density ratio as a function of Mach number. You should be fine.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2003, 17:22
Default Re: the question about validate code
  #4
Jarmo Monttinen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
M=0.1 is generally used for incompressible flows, see for example

Morgan, P. E. and M. R. Visbal. 2001. Simulation of Unsteady Three-dimensional Separation on a Pitching Wing. AIAA Paper 2001-2709

It works well, is below the M=0.3 limit, but still high enough to avoid numerical errors. M=0.01 is probably to low though.

Question is: What type of comparison are you trying to make at Re = 3900?

-- Jarmo
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2003, 22:42
Default Re: the question about validate code
  #5
Bin Li
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I will compare the velocity counter and Pressure, but density field is very different because of fluction! i want to validat my code by computing the cylinder flow.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2003, 16:37
Default Re: the question about validate code
  #6
Jarmo Monttinen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you run it at M=0.1 the fluctuation should be much smaller, if it still persists, you may have some other problems (is your farfield "far enough", are you comparing with experiments or computations, and so on)

You may also want to compute some Re ~ 100 as it is easier to validate.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apame: 3D panel code question pm3d Main CFD Forum 1 August 12, 2011 03:05
Open Source Vs Commercial Software MechE OpenFOAM 28 May 16, 2011 11:02
user friendly cfd code waqar Main CFD Forum 19 August 18, 2000 16:31
public CFD Code development Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 38 March 5, 1999 12:44
What kind of Cmmercial CFD code you feel well? Lans Main CFD Forum 13 October 27, 1998 11:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:47.