|
[Sponsors] |
July 28, 2009, 13:46 |
Secondary Breakup
|
#1 |
New Member
Jack Black
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am trying to chose the best secondary breakup model to use for a crossflow spray simulation. I can't find any literature that matches experimental results using the Reitz and Diwakar model. Is this because it is a new model, or it isn't a very reliable model?
|
|
November 9, 2009, 10:07 |
Solution ever necessary??
|
#2 |
New Member
Clément Baillard
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi
I'm working on the same things. The model you are speaking about is named Wave or KH. You can find information in the Fluent notice if you use it or in those publications : Modeling Atomization Processes in High-Pressure Vaporizing Sprays ; Rolf D. Reitz ; Atomisation and Spray Technology 3 (1987) pp 309-337 A Comparison of Classical Atomization Models against Current Experimental Measurements within a Zero-Dimensional Framework ; R. O. Grover, Jr.* and D. N. Assanis, A. M. Lippert ; 17th ILASS Americas, Arlington, VA, May 2004 Breakup Mechanisms and Drag Coefficient of High-Speed Vaporizing Liquid Drops , S.S. Hwang, Z. Liu and R. D. Reitz, 1996 If you have any information about choosing B0 and B1 whose known to depend of the characteristic of the spray (particularly B1), i am interesting :') Thank Clément |
|
Tags |
reitz diwakar, secondary breakup |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
secondary flow very small | Marko | CFX | 3 | September 19, 2013 21:49 |
WAVE & TAB breakup inconsistency | Orrin | FLUENT | 0 | January 7, 2009 11:02 |
breakup model for cleaning processes | Tim | CFX | 2 | November 21, 2007 16:14 |
bubble-drop coalescence and breakup | prat | FLUENT | 0 | March 29, 2007 15:46 |
Sinclair Model + secondary turbulence | Yi | FLUENT | 0 | October 26, 2001 13:37 |