CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

intake manifold simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 11, 2009, 00:24
Default intake manifold simulation
  #1
Member
 
uday
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16
uday is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am trying EGR mixing in the intake manifold to compare the cylinder to cylinder distribution in fluent. The manifold have two inlets (in this one is for fresh air & another is for EGR), two outlets for two cylinders.

Iam using pressure inlet & pressure outlet boundary conditions for manifold inlet & outlet.I have pressure values for inlet and outlets. but these are varing with crank angle. Like one out let open means another one is closing means acting like a wall. For this iam trying to write UDF.

Is this my approch is correct for mu prolem to find out EGR mass fraction in each cylinder.Other wise there are any methods to do this.

please give me suggestions on this matter.

Thanks in advance.
uday is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2009, 10:15
Default boundary conditions for EGR problem
  #2
New Member
 
ganesh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16
ganeshykr is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Instead of writing UDF for applying time varying boundary conditions, you should use "tabular transient profile" method available in Fluent. In this you'll have to specify all the variable values varying with crank angle in a text file (journal file) and open that after opening case file. Crank angle can be converted into time. Search in fluent users guide, you'll get all the details. Apply mass flow boundary conditions at the inlets and outlets. Let me know if i am not clear.
ganeshykr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2009, 02:52
Default
  #3
Member
 
uday
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16
uday is on a distinguished road
Thanks for u r replay.

I have one question when we are giving boundary conditions as a tabulated data what is the time span (means time period or iterrations) we have to give for different values:
ex:

sec pressure

1 0.2bar
2 0.3bar
3 0.5bar

here i take time difference means increse 1 sec so on which parametere it will depend.(Is it on timeperiod or iterration)

please give me suggestion on this matter.
uday is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2009, 03:11
Default EGR simulations
  #4
New Member
 
ganesh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16
ganeshykr is on a distinguished road
if i understood u clearly, you are asking about the time difference between two values. it depends on how accurate you want the calculations to be.
For eg. you may feed the data at every degree of crank rotation from 0 to 720 degrees (you will have 721 values) which will take long time to finish else you may feed data at every 10 degrees (you'll have 73 values). So, you can fix the time step size also accordingly i.e. dt = 1 or 10 degrees

you can convert degrees into seconds as

1 degree = 60 / (N x 360) seconds
ganeshykr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2009, 03:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
ganesh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16
ganeshykr is on a distinguished road
While creating the journal file for tabular transient profile specification, you need follow a format:

ProfileName NumberOfColumns NumberOfRows WhetherPeriodic(1)OrNot(0)
time profile1 profile2 profile3 ..................................
1
2
3
4
5
:
:
:

Last edited by ganeshykr; December 12, 2009 at 03:20. Reason: incomplete
ganeshykr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2009, 23:46
Default
  #6
Member
 
uday
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16
uday is on a distinguished road
Thanku for u r reply.
uday is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2009, 01:39
Default
  #7
Member
 
uday
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16
uday is on a distinguished road
morning friends,

iam doing simulation of twin cylinder intke manifold i got the converged solution.but the problem is it not showing any teparature distribution.when iam cliking mouse(left) in the working space it showing the distribution.
there is no this type of problem with pressure.
So please give me suggestions in this matter.
Thanks in advance.
uday is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Exhaust Gas manifold simulation shrinath Siemens 6 September 5, 2013 16:26
Intake manifold analysis mehndan Main CFD Forum 6 July 3, 2008 05:28
1D3D GT coupling :intake manifold convergence prob Micky Siemens 1 June 20, 2008 23:02
Modeling of a airflow in a intake manifold Jack FLUENT 1 September 21, 2003 22:22
Modeling of a airflow in a intake manifold Jack Siemens 1 September 15, 2003 05:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25.