# grid singularity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 27, 2004, 06:10 grid singularity #1 cfd student Guest   Posts: n/a hi every body the finite difference method use the four edges mesh , how can I overcome the grid singularity when I make a mesh for example a sharp cone.

 January 27, 2004, 10:03 Re: grid singularity #2 Marcus Lobbia Guest   Posts: n/a There are probably a few options you can consider (assuming you are dealing with the compressible Euler or NS equations): 1) Move to finite-volume discretization. In this case, your flow properties will be located at the cell center (instead of cell nodes), which makes it much easier to deal with grid singularities. On the other hand, implementation of boundary conditions is a little more complicated (you will need to create ghost cells, reflect the normal velocity component for a surface BC instead of just setting it equal to zero, etc.). 2) If the freestream flow is supersonic, you can probably get away without including the region before the discontinuity (for an example similar to a sharp cone, anyway). This is really only appropriate, though, if your singular point corresponds to the stagnation point, and you are sure that only oblique shock waves will result (i.e., a cone/wedge with a large surface angle will not meet this requirement). 3) Use a multi-block approach to divide your grid domain into regions that do not contain singularities. Can be a complicated process depending on the geometry, however, and you will still have to deal with transfer of flow properties at the boundaries of each block. Basically, you are adding complexity to eliminate the singular point. Personally, I prefer option #1 as it is (in my opinion) the easiest and most robust method of dealing with complex geometry containing singularities. Option #2 is an easy method for some cases, but may only work for simple cases (e.g., cone/wedge/plate in supersonic flow). Option #3 is probably only worth considering if you already have a multi-block grid generator/solver available (if you are writing your own, you might be better off considering option #1). Keep in mind that most of my work is in finite-volume compressible Euler/NS, so I may very well be missing some other possiblities in the above explanation...

 July 27, 2011, 06:07 #3 Member   Daniel Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Manchester Posts: 31 Rep Power: 8 I'm resurrecting this topic. I'm looking to create an axisymmetric mesh to look at some missile aerodynamics at high angle of attack. The mesh I would like to be something similar to this: However, in Gambit I cannot create a 3D mesh by rotating a 2D face around the axis of symmetry. I assume this is due to the existence of a singularity as when I tested to create a 'thin' or 'hollow' cylinder there is no problem with sweeping the mesh. Any advice on a way around this in Gambit?

 April 8, 2012, 05:11 #4 New Member   Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 22 Rep Power: 7 Hi Can you create 3D mesh for your problem? I think mustn't be hard!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post prasanthnitt Main CFD Forum 1 June 19, 2009 12:54 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58 liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07 ken FLUENT 0 September 4, 2003 11:08 Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13.