|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello.
I have some experience in FLUENT. Could somebody please compare the capabilities of CFX or Star-CD with FLUENT? For example: - The advantages and disadvantages of each one? - Which one is more user-friendly? - Which areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer, each of them is strong in? - Do they have a good pre and post processor? - Do they have good support team? - Their User-Defined-Functions Thank you, Mazyar |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I also want to know which one is better between CFX & Fluent.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 02:54 |
| Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 13:14 |
| High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
| Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
| Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX | Tim | FLUENT | 0 | December 6, 2005 22:03 |