|December 23, 2009, 09:14||
Mesh Size & Turn Around Time
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 19Rep Power: 6
Perhaps this would be better as a poll, but I don't think we have that for CFD-Online yet.
I have been asked by my management who is CFD illiterate to show where our computational facilities are relative to some "state of the art". I think this might be best described in terms of what a "state of the art" mesh size might be, and what a "a state of the art" turn around time might be, and then compare that to what we can do with our available resources. I thought a time line might also be helpful.
So I ask you;
What would you consider current mesh sizes for:
Large but infrequent (once a year within an analysis team)
Large but frequent (4 or 5 times a year within an analysis team)
Daily driver / typical mesh size
Quick and dirty problem
And then turn around time for the problem
My thinking is that for 2010 a state of the art facility should be able to run:
Grand Challenge - 1 billion cells / 2 months
Large infrequent - 50 million cells / 3 to 4 weeks
Large frequent - 10 million cells / 2 weeks
Daily driver - 3 million cells / 1 week
Quick and Dirty - 500K cells / 2 days
Note my times are non-linear. I am assuming that the smaller problems are sharing compute resource with more jobs and the Grand Challenge gets every clock cycle available.
I am still thinking about what those numbers would have been in 2000 and 1990.
Any help is appreciated
|January 2, 2010, 19:09||
on which operating system you use openfoam?
The resolution sounds accurate. I suppose the time depends the solution type, residual targets, transient values, hardware, etc.
I recently built a high end singe processor desktop system with enough ram to handle 12million cells. If the solution time is indeed linear with respect to the number of cells, I should be able solve a 12million cell steady state solution in a little less than 3 hours(running all 4 cores). Obviously those numbers go up when transients are involved, but 2 weeks(336hr) seems pretty significant for a state of the art facility.
Hope that helps!
FYI: DIY OpenFOAM1.6 Hardware Benchmark
|January 3, 2010, 16:59||
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7Rep Power: 5
As always the answer will be "it all depends"!
If it is a complicated multiphysics problem, you can spend a few months getting a commercially reasonable result with a couple of million cells/nodes.
Also the experience of the operator will also impact on the time it takes to complete the work, also if you have a previous example this helps a lot......
|January 6, 2010, 18:43||
I figured out how to start a poll:
Click the "Thread Tools" in the submenu at the top of the forum.
Then click "Add a poll to this thread"
It will only let you do it if you are the thread starter(obvious but relevant).
|compute resource, history, mesh size|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Is there a way to write the time step size, time a||may||FLUENT||6||November 22, 2009 11:52|
|Mesh size for particulate flow simulations||Shahri||Main CFD Forum||0||March 24, 2009 18:40|
|SnappyHexMesh not generate mesh first time||mavimo||OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities||4||August 26, 2008 07:08|
|Transient simulation not converging||skabilan||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||12||September 17, 2007 17:48|
|unstructured vs. structured grids||Frank Muldoon||Main CFD Forum||1||January 5, 1999 10:09|