|January 15, 2010, 00:15||
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29Rep Power: 7
I have a general doubt with compressible DNS/LES codes. Explicit schemes model both the length and time scales accurately while implicit schemes might not represent the time scales accurately due to large CFL. Besides, many implicit schemes are only second or 3rd order accurate. In case of DNS or LES where both length and time scales might be important, I am wondering which one should I choose. A lower CFL would naturally favor explicit schemes.
If one wants to develop an efficient unstructured higher order LES code based on DG, which one of the time stepping schemes is preferable?
Explicit (like RK-DG schemes)
Implicit ( Dual time stepping, etc. )
Explicit-Implicit (implicit near boundary, explicit at coarser grids)
Explicit-Explicit (variable time steps)
Thanks in advance for your reply.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end||xiuying||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||8||August 27, 2013 15:33|
|Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||17||August 22, 2009 03:59|
|local time stepping and pseudo time||phil||NUMECA||0||February 27, 2006 17:26|
|Could anybody help me see this error and give help||liugx212||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||January 4, 2006 19:07|
|Dual Time Stepping Method||X. Ye||Main CFD Forum||1||September 23, 1999 04:05|