# how to ensure that your modelling is correct

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 27, 2004, 08:11 how to ensure that your modelling is correct #1 rvndr Guest   Posts: n/a Hi I am a beginner and want to know the answer for this questions ?Suppose you are modelling some problem in CFD, which has numerical solution or experimental result. In this case you will compare your CFD result with the experimental result. On the other hand, now suppose you are modelling some problem which has no experimental result. Then in this case how will you ensure that your CFD modelling result is correct ? one more thing is if you already have experimental result then what is the need for going CFD modelling again ? This questions may not sounds well but you have to bare with me as I am a beginner.Thanks in advance rvndr

 February 27, 2004, 11:54 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #2 Jarmo Monttinen Guest   Posts: n/a Well... if you do not have experimental results to compare with, go with other computational results (=verification). If this is not available either, find a case that is similar to yours, and for which there is data available. If you can make reasonable comparison with other data and then show that your own CFD-results are converged (ie. perform grid convergence study etc) your data could be ok. As about the need for CFD... I could come up with various funny reasons, but on the serious side setting up a CFD computation is cheaper and quicker than setting up an experiment. And there are many other reasons, I'm sure we could fill the whole message board discussing these... -- Jarmo

 February 27, 2004, 12:45 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #3 chinthakindi Guest   Posts: n/a Hi rvndr,it is very good question, in the begining all will get such a doubt. my answer for ur question is, see if u want to do expt it is involving much complexity ,like inaccuracy with instruments, lot of expenses and time. if u take the numerical modeling, it is more accurate and involving of less risk. to test ur models, there is no need of expt results, u can test by doing DNS of the small portion of ur computational domain.again doing DNS for the entire domain is involving of large computational power of CPU and time, u can avoid this by selecting small domain for doing DNS , this results is sifficient enough to test ur results,, prior to this as Jarmo told,ur model will be verified even with grid convergence results.. i hope ur doubt is clarified

 February 27, 2004, 14:47 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #4 alex Guest   Posts: n/a fascinating

 February 28, 2004, 01:01 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #5 rvndr Guest   Posts: n/a hi jarmo, Thanks for the reply. Could you please give me some examples for "other computational results " & "case that is similar to yours". Thanks again in advance rvndr

 February 28, 2004, 19:48 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #6 Jonas Holdeman Guest   Posts: n/a Responding to your question, "if you already have experimental result then what is the need for going CFD modelling again ?" If the experimental results are correct and your computations agree with the experimental results, there is still information to be gained from computation. There are flow properties at points that were not instrumented, additional properties not measured under experimental conditions, flow properties under different conditions and different geometries. Access to instrumented wind tunnels or flow chambers may be expensive, time consumming, or not available near you. With a good program and a desk top computer or workstation, you have access to computed flow measurements from anywhere in the world at no additional capital outlay.

 February 28, 2004, 23:43 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #7 rvndr Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, Jonas Holdeman thanks for the reply. It cleared my boubts fully. regards rvndr

 March 1, 2004, 13:21 Re: how to ensure that your modelling is correct #8 Jarmo Monttinen Guest   Posts: n/a It all depends on what type of problem you are solving... Just an example: you wish to compute the flow over an aspect-ratio 4-8 wing, Mach about 0.85. You could for example compute the ONERA M6 wing at M = 0.8395 for which there is plenty of data available. Hope this helps. -- Jarmo

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20 xlxc34 Main CFD Forum 0 June 24, 2011 04:42 Martin Main CFD Forum 3 October 14, 2008 05:16 Carlos FLUENT 0 September 26, 2008 11:37 yeo FLUENT 4 March 7, 2003 08:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:26.