- **Main CFD Forum**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/*)

- - **Some confusion about coupled solver for incompressible flow**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/72682-some-confusion-about-coupled-solver-incompressible-flow.html*)

Some confusion about coupled solver for incompressible flowHi,
I am working on the coding of a coupled solver for steady-state incompressible flow (pressure-based). I want to strengthen myself the background theory before doing programming. It is hard to find a complete and systematic tutorial (CFD books for engineers) on this, except some math papers. Here are some questions: 1. What's the difference between a strongly coupled and a weak(or regular) coupled? Does the "strongly coupled" also mean strongly implicit? Any example paper? 2. Is the use of artificial-compressibility taken as a coupled way? I think it's welcomed in some papers but not in commercial codes. Is it right? 3. What is a smoother, pre-smoother and post-smoother? is it the same concept with preconditioner? 4. Is multigrid a method or a preconditioner or can be both? 5. I am thinking of a design of the numerics for a wind turbine problem to achieve the best convergence speed: diagonal Vanka smoother + ILU preconditioner + geometrical multigrid (accelerator)+ BiCGStab (solver) Is this practical? 6. When I should use a flux-splitting scheme? Is it necessary or just upwind schemes will be sufficient? 7. What kind of velocity-pressure coupling should I use for FVM collated grid? Rhie-Chow interpolation, pseudo-velocity or other method? 8. Should I keep the time-term (hyperbolic) or just solve the steady-state equation (elliptic)? Can anyone help? Thank you. |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:48. |