CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Commercial or OpenSource

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2010, 10:26
Default Commercial or OpenSource
  #1
New Member
 
Anon
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
DeMan is on a distinguished road
Hi All, I have a question for the experts.
We are about to begin some modelling and no-one in the company really knows what they are doing. We need to outsource. I need to know if we should be going with OpenFOAM or a commercial product. Main application is industrial, where high air speeds, turbulence, compressible flows and rotating machinery all play a role. Also thermodynamics in some experiments.

So Q's as follows:
1) Is OpenFoam capable of this type of work, or should we go with a commercial product? I am told CFX may be the way to go.
2) Are there any consultants availablein Australia/NZ who can offer contractual services using OpenFoam
3) How does SolidWorks Flow Simulation stack up? I feel our Engineering contractor (who does not believe in CFD) will try to get the work based on their integraction with existing CAD material. [Its my poor assumption that solidworks may not compare to the likes of Fluent/CFX/OpenFoam]

Appreciate your honest feedback!

Cheers.....
DeMan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 14:52
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Vladislav
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
Vladik is on a distinguished road
An answer to the first question is perhaps as follows:

1) If you plan to simulate unsteady flows, then OpenFOAM can do the job, but the timestep will be 10 to 50 times smaller than that in CDX because of limitation of the Courant number, which must not exceed 1. Correspondingly, getting results with OpenFOAM is going to be too slow and boring.
Vladik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 15:47
Default
  #3
Member
 
Newton KF
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 8
NewtonKF is on a distinguished road
Hi...

I think both opensource and commercial software can do the simulations you need.. The great difference is the way you learn and use them... Remember that the best software is the one that you know how to use...

Commercial softwares are, usually, easier to use and learn than opensource for numerical simulations... CFX and fluent are good and easy softwares to use for consultant simulations... OpenFoam, is best for academics... but more people are migrating to open-software to reduce cost of operation... If you think in complex simulations, you probably will need some package that can run in parallel, so its cost is higher...

And about the CFL number cited by Vladik, you will have to use this advective time increment criterium in any software that run explicit or semi-implicit simulations... Although CFX may allow you to use CFL numbers greater than one, for realistic simulations, you will generally need to use CFL smaller than 1, independently of the software you will use...

good luck...
NewtonKF is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx, fluent, openfoam, solidworks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tired of employers focus on commercial code experience Steven P. Lounge 21 May 14, 2014 09:43
Buy commercial cfd software for adsorption li yong Main CFD Forum 0 March 19, 2001 22:27
Commercial finite element CFD codes Therese Rhodes Main CFD Forum 4 November 10, 2000 17:45
user friendly cfd code waqar Main CFD Forum 19 August 18, 2000 16:31
own Code vs. commercial code Bernhard Mueck Main CFD Forum 10 February 16, 2000 11:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:05.