CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Human Powered Vehicle Study

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 2, 2010, 09:29
Default Human Powered Vehicle Study
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
robinfisichella is on a distinguished road
Hi, I am currently conducting an investigation into the aerodynamics of a human powered vehicle such as seen here http://www.speed101.com/photos.htm

My aim is too closely match a published figure for a certain HPV of Cd=0.045

I am having some issues currently, my console is giving me limited tubulent viscoscity problems.

Could someone please suggest if any of my input conditions seem off?

Star CCM+

Sparat Allmaras Model
Velocity=32.25 (0 yaw)
Turb viscosity ratio=5
or
Turb intensity=0.01 (value as seen, this means 1% right?)
Length scale 20m (half the domain height)
velocity scale = 0.4m/s

Im using a trimmer mesh, the object is close to the ground, no rotating wheels. I am using a wind tunnel type domain with slip walls as the far field boundaries.

Cheers
robinfisichella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2010, 10:50
Default Turbulent Intensity and Turbulent Length Scale
  #2
Senior Member
 
gocarts's Avatar
 
Richard Smith
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Enfield, NH, USA
Posts: 138
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 8
gocarts is on a distinguished road
If you are going to use the turbulent intensity and turbulent length scale option then I'd guess (I'm not a Star CMM+ user) that:

Matching absolute drag values from experiments is a tough call, just ask the drag workshop: http://aaac.larc.nasa.gov/tsab/cfdlarc/aiaa-dpw/

In my opinion CFD is better suited to computing drag for different designs and using the relative difference (from a baseline) in value to make design decisions.

Hope this helps
__________________
Symscape, Computational Fluid Dynamics for all
gocarts is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2010, 10:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
robinfisichella is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocarts View Post
If you are going to use the turbulent intensity and turbulent length scale option then I'd guess (I'm not a Star CMM+ user) that:

Matching absolute drag values from experiments is a tough call, just ask the drag workshop: http://aaac.larc.nasa.gov/tsab/cfdlarc/aiaa-dpw/

In my opinion CFD is better suited to computing drag for different designs and using the relative difference (from a baseline) in value to make design decisions.

Hope this helps
Thanks that re-assures me on a few things.
robinfisichella is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human Powered Vehicle Study robinfisichella STAR-CCM+ 0 March 2, 2010 09:08
Human Powered Vehicle Simulation robinfisichella STAR-CCM+ 2 January 7, 2010 06:21
Study Mario Main CFD Forum 0 August 24, 2009 09:59
CFD study for a MAV(Micro Air Vehicle) raj Main CFD Forum 3 June 14, 1999 20:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28.