
[Sponsors] 
March 4, 2010, 22:29 
Viscous Flux Jacobian

#1 
Member

Who has the experience computing viscous flux Jacobian for incompressible flow?
Suppose we set the primitive variables as [P, U, V, W]. I know hand calculating the convective flux Jacobian analytically is easy. But for viscous flux, the situation looks different. My own hand derivation shows that it should be zero for Cartesian grid. It may not be zero in the case of curvilinear grid. Am I correct? Thank you. 

March 9, 2010, 13:58 

#2 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 8 
The viscous flux Jacobians are not zero for a Cartesian grid.


March 9, 2010, 19:52 

#3 
Member

Thank you for your reply.
But are you sure? I mean incompressible flow with constant viscosity here. suppose in 2D case with kinematic viscosity as miu primitive variable: Q=[ P, U, V ], convective flux in X: E=[ U, U*U+P, UV ] viscous flux in X: Ev=[ 0, 2*miu*ddU/ddX, miu*(ddU/ddY+ddV/ddX) ] When I do the viscous flux Jacobian analytically: dd(Ev)/ddQ, all derivatives of Ev elements in terms of P,U or V get nothing. And someone also remind me the viscous terms are linear for incompressible NS eq. Last edited by bearcat; March 9, 2010 at 21:23. 

March 9, 2010, 20:53 

#4 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 8 
I am assuming you are trying to develop an implicit algorithm. Since the viscous terms are linear, if you write Q(N+1) = Q(N) + DQ and substitute into the diff. eq., the terms containing the DQ can be carried to the lefthand side. The flux Jacobian (or the contribution to the system matrix) follow from that. In this case it will be mu multiplied by the coefficients of the difference terms.


March 9, 2010, 21:36 

#5  
Member

Quote:
Yes, if we use a Jacobianfree NewtonKrylov method, your idea will be implemented easily. But I think if we can cancel it out analytically, then we don't have to compute it numerically and save some effort. The original 2D eq is: ddQ/ddt+dd(EEv)/ddX+dd(FFv)/ddY=0 (no source term) The 3x3 Jacobian matrix often acts as a coefficient in system matrix. My opinion is that all elements in viscous flux Jacobian matrix are zero if no coordinate transform is involved. 

March 9, 2010, 22:35 

#6 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 8 
You can ignore them, but the advantage of including them is that they contribute to the diagonal dominance of the coefficient matrix.


March 11, 2010, 01:40 
This paper maybe is useful for you

#7 
New Member
peter. zhao
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: China
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7 
For compressible flow, the below paper maybe is useful.
"Implicit multigrid solution of the compressible NavierStokes equations with application to distributed parallel processing", Tysinger, Thomas Lee, Ph.D. Thesis Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY,1992. This paper introduced the viscous jacobian matrix for compressible NS equation. I think this method is also useful for your problem. 

March 11, 2010, 07:03 
not zero

#8 
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 8 
[QUOTE=bearcat;249236]
viscous flux in X: Ev=[ 0, 2*miu*ddU/ddX, miu*(ddU/ddY+ddV/ddX) ] When I do the viscous flux Jacobian analytically: dd(Ev)/ddQ, all derivatives of Ev elements in terms of P,U or V get nothing. You get something. For example, dd(Ev)/ddU = [0, 2*miu*dd/ddX, miu*dd/ddY ] A discretized version would be dd(Ev)/ddU = [0, 2*miu*(1/Delta x), miu*(1/Delta y) ] gory 

March 11, 2010, 13:46 

#9  
Member

Quote:
viscous jacobian for compressible flow appears in many CFD books. But that's an easier and completely different case. For incompressible flow we don't have density as a primitive variable. [QUOTE=gory;249527] Quote:
Last edited by bearcat; March 11, 2010 at 14:08. 

March 11, 2010, 14:20 

#10 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 8 
It's what you'll get if you follow the steps I outlined above  it results from the linear nature of the PDE and the linearization of the aforementioned viscous terms.


March 11, 2010, 18:14 
Jacobians

#11  
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
I don't know any reference. I agree with agd that you follow his instruction and you'll get it. Example: Consider a simple diffusion equation, ut = df/dx, where f = du/dx (d = \partial, i.e., one partial). Then, ut = A du/dx, where A=df/du=d(du/dx)/du=d/dx. It is an operator. If you're interested in the Jacobian (I'm not sure if you are) of the residual. It's related but a bit different, I think. I guess it goes like this: A discretized version of df/dx may be RHS(j) =(u_{j+1}  2 u_j + u_{j1})/(Delta x)^2, where RHSis a residual vector and RHS(j) is the jth component. The Jacobian is a matrix defined as dRHS/dU where U = [u1, u2, u_{j1}, u_j, ...], i.e., the discrete values. So, for example, (dRHS/U)(j,j) = dRHS(j)/du_j = 2 / (Delta x)^2 (dRHS/U)(j,j1) = dRHS(j)/du_{j1}= 1/(Delta x)^2 and so on. In any case, the Jacobian is not zero for viscous terms, I think. gory 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Jacobian Matrix of Van Leer Flux Splitting Vector  Jackson  Main CFD Forum  2  July 29, 2010 10:57 
Flux Jacobian for flux splitting  mecheng1600  Main CFD Forum  0  December 5, 2009 21:07 
viscous flux treatment in compressible NS sovler  JG  Main CFD Forum  2  January 9, 2008 16:29 
Jacobian Coefficient matrices for the viscous flux  Andy  Main CFD Forum  8  February 26, 2004 00:53 
Jacobian Coefficient matrices for the viscous flux  Andy  Main CFD Forum  0  February 19, 2004 14:59 