|March 5, 2010, 18:29||
components of velocity used by fluent and cfx
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 38Rep Power: 7
Which components of velocity are used by fluent and cfx?
curvilinear (covariant) or cartesian?
Which one is more preferable?
For an external turbulent flow over a blunt body which one do u suggest?
|March 7, 2010, 22:25||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 116Rep Power: 12
I can't really answer your question about which is preferable. If you have a finite difference solver and an analytical mapping for the grid, the covariant frame may give you slightly better precision in resolving flows near the surface, as the surface-normal component will be small or zero and the tangent components may be orders of magnitude larger. In 64-bit floating point, I doubt that will make much of a difference though.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX||marco||FLUENT||13||February 18, 2015 00:19|
|OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX||marco||Main CFD Forum||81||March 31, 2009 14:22|
|solving ocean wave with Fluent or CFX?||gholamghar||Main CFD Forum||1||March 21, 2009 13:49|
|Fluent and CFX||Ale||FLUENT||0||July 1, 2008 08:36|
|Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure||Omer||CFX||9||June 28, 2007 04:13|