# moving grid with domain size change

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 12, 2004, 05:24 moving grid with domain size change #1 Hu Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, Everyone, I want to use CFX 4 to solve the moving problem. The moving grid techniques are used in the case but the problem is as the grids move, the domain volume will increase or decrease. Should I add the mass source or sink to account for the volume increase or decrease in order to meet the continuity equation? Many thanks

 May 12, 2004, 05:57 Re: moving grid with domain size change #2 Praveen Guest   Posts: n/a Yes, something like that is required. Search for geometric conservation law.

 May 12, 2004, 06:54 Re: moving grid with domain size change #3 John Luo Guest   Posts: n/a No, you should not do anything if the moving mesh effects are already taken into account in the Navier-Stokes equations. Say you have engine cylinder with no inlets and outlets, then when piston moves up and down, the mass will stay the same, only pressure and density will change to satify mass conservation.

 May 12, 2004, 11:06 Re: moving grid with domain size change #4 Hu Guest   Posts: n/a John, Thanks for your reply. I agree with you about the piston case. But for my case, the mass did increase or decrease. It does not stay the same. How to keep mass conservation without adding mass ? Hu

 May 12, 2004, 15:04 Re: moving grid with domain size change #5 John Luo Guest   Posts: n/a In this case, either CFX does not do a good job in moving mesh implementation (I heard someone mentioned this before), or you didn't set your case up properly. You could try to describe your case in more detail. In any case, the mass has to conserve.

 May 13, 2004, 21:14 Re: moving grid with domain size change #6 Chris Sideroff Guest   Posts: n/a I agree with John Luo lasts reply - CFX is not implementing the moving grid properly. If the numerical discretization if conversative in time as well as in space then continuity will be satisfied. A previous colleague of mine wrote a CFD code with a moving grid and by constructioning his temporal discritization conservatively autmatically satisfied continuity. The geometric convservation law (or GCL) is a product of improperly constructing the time discretization and used to be an ad hoc way of satisfying continuity. It is essentially a tranport equation for the transformation of the Jacobian matrix.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 24 August 24, 2010 11:22 Kevin CFX 3 November 12, 2006 16:48 David FLUENT 4 June 8, 2005 16:20 Chuck Leakeas Main CFD Forum 2 May 26, 2000 11:18 Jin Li Main CFD Forum 1 May 19, 2000 10:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:41.