CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

DIFFUSION free schemes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 12, 2004, 07:59
Default DIFFUSION free schemes
  #1
question
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
my lecturer says the scheme he uses if diffusion free.

what does it mean by diffusion free, and which schemes are and which are not diffsion free?

also he seemed to imply it had something to do with the type of mesh?

can some one please explain. thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2004, 13:08
Default Re: DIFFUSION free schemes
  #2
centaur_ks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i guess by diffusion free he means Numerical diffusion free
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2004, 01:11
Default Re: DIFFUSION free schemes
  #3
agg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The higher the grid resolution, the lower the diffusion. The higher the order of accuracy of discretization, the lower the diffusion.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2004, 09:39
Default Re: DIFFUSION free schemes
  #4
Li Yang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As far as I know, the central difference scheme is less diffusive and upwind schemes are quite diffusive.

But is there any scheme which has no numerical diffusion ? I have never heard of.

Li

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2004, 21:00
Default Re: DIFFUSION free schemes
  #5
Chris Sideroff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In determining the numerical behavior of a scheme you must look at order of the truncated terms (from the discretization)

There are two types of numerical error - dissipation (diffusion) and dispersion (oscillatory)

Even order truncatation tends to be dissipative Odd order truncation tends to be dispersive

First orders schemes (first order upwind, Lax scheme, etc) have second order truncation error thus they are dissipative. This is why obtaining solutions tend to be easy for first order schemes but are notoriously inaccurate unless you use VERY fine grids.

Second order schemes (central difference, second order upwind) have third order truncation error so they tend to be disperive or oscillatory. Due to this solutions can be difficult to obtain. Usually modifications are made to damp out the oscillations: artificial viscosity for central differencing and TVD and ENO schemes for second order upwinding.

The same holds true for higher order schemes. The difficulty with higher order schemes is maintaining a uniform accuracy on the boundaries (because the stencil gets large).

Hope that clears thing up - Oh and to answer your inital question NO CFD algorithm is without numerical dissipation - even the best schemes contain a little
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2004, 03:14
Default Is ideal DIFFUSION free schemes possible?
  #6
Zeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have two genernal questions: (1) Is really a diffusion free scheme possible? (2) What wiil be happen if we choose a high-order scheme with lower-order boundary ? I mean, for example, we use a 4-order scheme, but in boundary condition, it is only 2-order precision, what is the effect for the lower-order scheme in boundary?

Thanks your responding in advance!
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2004, 04:15
Default Re: Is ideal DIFFUSION free schemes possible?
  #7
Praveen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As others have written before some numerical diffusion is necessary if you want to get reasonable numerical solution especially for convection-dominated systems.

It is enough if the boundary scheme is one order less accurate than the interior scheme. The overall accuracy will still be equal to that of the interior scheme. I cant recall where I have read this, probably in a paper by D. W. Zingg. Hope somebody else can point to some references.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2004, 05:02
Default Re: DIFFUSION free schemes
  #8
Onno
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Be careful Chris; In answer to your answer: " ... NO CFD algorithm is without numerical dissipation - even the best schemes contain a little" The Hyper-C scheme of Leonard see 1991 Comp. Meth. in Appl. Mech. Eng. Vol. 88, p.17-74 is completely diffusion free, but pretty useless as it turns any moderate gradient into a step profile.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2004, 14:23
Default Re: Is ideal DIFFUSION free schemes possible?
  #9
QK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm not 100% sure.. but, Hirsh's book discusses the issue on the interior/boundary accuarcy. It should have a pointer to some papers.

I kind of remember seeing a diff. free schemes in Lohner's book. It supposedly makes the dissipation term propotional to residual.

I feel like an idiot.. Time to read/study more.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2004, 01:48
Default Re: Is ideal DIFFUSION free schemes possible?
  #10
Praveen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In

A residual-based compact scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations by Alain Lerat and Christophe Corre

a centered scheme is modified by adding dissipation that depends on the residual.

<blockquote style="border: solid 1px #006699;"> ... the process for getting a high accuracy as well as the construction of the numerical dissipation rely strongly on the residual vanishing at steady state. Starting from a basic centered scheme, the idea for increasing the accuracy order is not to cancel the leading term of the truncation error, but to add a new error term so that the resulting truncation error be expressed in terms of derivatives of the residual only. </blockquote>

Even though the residual vanishes at steady state, the scheme still has dissipation.

<blockquote style="border: solid 1px #006699;"> For simplicity and robustness, we use a first-order dissipation operator, which is compatible with any accuracy order. More precisely, by applying this operator, a centered scheme accurate at order 2p becomes a dissipative scheme accurate at order 2p-1 (dissipation at steady state comes from the truncation error of the dissipation operator). </blockquote>

I haven't come across any scheme which is totally free of dissipation. Would be interested to hear about such schemes. If you want the above paper then mail me at cpraveen[at]gmail.com
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2004, 05:04
Default Re: Is ideal DIFFUSION free schemes possible?
  #11
Zeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for all of your kindly reply.

Zeng
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
Numerical schemes for free surface flows (VOF) botp OpenFOAM 2 March 11, 2011 16:27
Can Flow-3D plot the free surface area in Iso-surface or colour variable? therockyy FLOW-3D 1 June 20, 2010 19:36
HELP: diffusion & dispersion of particle method QU KUN Main CFD Forum 0 January 22, 2004 02:21
CFX 4.4 New free surface option Viatcheslav Anissimov CFX 0 April 3, 2002 06:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:18.