CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

traditional driven cavity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 27, 2004, 20:19
Default traditional driven cavity
  #1
Azfarizal Bin Mukhtar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hai... actually i'm University Teknologi Malaysia's student in last year. so right now i'm doing thesis about traditional driven cavity with different aspect ratio. i'm doing this thesis by use the program force 208(fortran compiler) so can anyone help me about what the effect can we get when using different aspect ratio and what the application can we get from that. For your knowledge my mesh is H=129 and L=129 (square cavity)
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 28, 2004, 03:01
Default Re: traditional driven cavity
  #2
Maciej Matyka
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Please see a paper about the SIMPLE/R - and Vorticity Stream approach with Driven Cavity benchmarks - available on my web page:

"Solution to two-dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations with SIMPLE, SIMPLER and Vorticity-Stream Function Approaches. Driven-Lid Cavity Problem: Solution and Visualization.", Maciej Matyka , University of Linkoping, CFD Project Report #3, 30.VI.2004

Hope it will be helpful,

Best Regards, Maciej Matyka <A HREF="http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/">http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2004, 18:49
Default Re: traditional driven cavity
  #3
jenn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is alway puzzling to me why people always use two-dimensional simulation to replace three-dimensional case. Of course, the vorticity-streamfunction approach is very simple and less costly. But the physics is maybe very different? So why bothering use two-dimensional? For CFD beginner to practice, it is no harm. But for a real application, I doubt it. Anyone knows people do comparison work between the 2D case and 3D case? That will be very nice and convincing.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2004, 04:56
Default Re: traditional driven cavity
  #4
Maciej Matyka
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe the reason is, that on my Athlon 2.1 Ghz there is no possibility to run my code hundred times to check the results and clear all the mistakes in algorithm?

I am using 2d cases just to finish the solver and then easly move it into 3d space. Also it is much easier to make efficient visualization for 2d case. And finally - there is a lot of benchmarks over the web for two dimensional codes.

Best Regards, Maciej Matyka <A HREF="http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/">http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/</a>
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lid Driven Cavity using Ghost Cell Method and in C++ illuminati5288 Main CFD Forum 0 August 12, 2011 22:05
is there any parallel code for the famous Lid Driven Cavity flow? gholamghar Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2010 01:55
The 2-D Driven Cavity Problem debiao Main CFD Forum 2 January 11, 2006 14:14
problem for driven cavity Azfarizal B Mukhtar Main CFD Forum 0 August 12, 2004 10:26
Traditional driven cavity Azfarizal b Mukhtar CFX 0 July 27, 2004 21:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45.