CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CFL number in steady simulations

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 15, 2010, 10:30
Default CFL number in steady simulations
  #1
Rol
New Member
 
Roland
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
Rol is on a distinguished road
as i understood, the CFL number limits the time step in an unsteady simulation. But how can the CFL number affect a steady simulation?

From experience I know that a higher CFL number leads to faster convergence, but is less stable, so the CFL number must be somehow used by the solver, even in a steady simulation.

i would appreciate any enlightenment
Rol is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2010, 01:16
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Shyam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
shyamdsundar is on a distinguished road
The CFL number is a scaling factor to limit the time step size. For transient problem, this time step size is controlled by the element size and the wave speed for stability purpose. The time step size should also be respected to maintain temporal accuracy of the solution.

Now, for steady state problems, the CFL limit is still essential for maintaining stability of the solver. But, since the time accuracy is not needed, one can choose unphysical time stepping methods. Some of them are: Local time stepping, multi-grid, GMRES class of methods etc., which accelerate the convergence of the solution to steady state.
shyamdsundar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2010, 09:28
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Freddie Sizer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
f_sizer is on a distinguished road
Rol, would you by any chance be using an implicit solver?
If you are then I don't think the CFL condition applies in the way that you are probably thinking. i.e explicitly.
In an explicit solver the cfl condition is everything, however with implicit solvers there is an extra equation that needs to be solved, which somehow means that cfl numbers can be much higher leading to the faster convergence you mentioned.
Can anyone on here describe how to estimate the cfl number to use in implicit codes?
f_sizer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 20, 2010, 05:08
Default
  #4
Rol
New Member
 
Roland
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
Rol is on a distinguished road
yes, sorry, i should have mentioned that we use an implicid solver. i can not tell you how to estimate be cfl number for steady simulations, but i can tell you that we use cfl numbers from 100 to 0.1, 100 for fast convergence, 1 for the first 100 iterations. i always let my simulations converge with a final cfl number between 10 and 1. I have seen similar values for another code, so i guess that are standard values.

could you give a reference to that extra equation, wher the cfl number occurs?
Rol is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 20, 2010, 09:17
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Freddie Sizer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
f_sizer is on a distinguished road
the simplest and best description is on wikipedia under explicit and implicit methods:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explici...plicit_methods

It's just the difference in the way that the differential equations are numerically solved, so nothing to complex, although when applied to navier stokes there is an extra computation to solve each ode.

That last bit confuses me a little bit because you would think this extra computation would increase convergence time!

Some more reading required!.......
f_sizer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfl number

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 20:43
CFL number question from novice James FLUENT 0 January 7, 2009 06:48
About CFL number yan NUMECA 5 January 1, 2006 06:07
How to calculate CFL Number in star-CD Xobile CD-adapco 10 December 18, 2004 07:37
About Courant (CFL) number Jason Main CFD Forum 2 March 17, 2003 12:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:57.