CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 16, 2004, 10:02
Default Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #1
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi guys

I am very new in multiphase flow modeling and I have to make a choice between CFX-5 and FLuent. I want to have a clue of the performance of CFX-5 versus FLuent in terms of multiphse flow modeling. Your information is appreciated.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2004, 19:17
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #2
Seb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Paul,

Last year I had to perform numerical simulation sof two phase gas-liquid flows. First, my colleague and I tried to solve it with CFX, after three months, we could not get anywhere with it and I decided to switch to fluent. After one month, I had a first 2D model ready, the 3D model came about two months later.

I think that both CFX and Fluent are good software. But I think that Fluent have the following advantages:

1) Geometries are easier to built with gambit than CFX geometry package;

2) User defined routines are much easier to set up with Fluent.

3) At that time, CFX 5.5 could not handle 2D geometries. 2D problems could only solved in a 3D domain. (But this could have changed by now.)

Nevertheless, my colleague uses CFX to solve problems that involve combustion and transport of chemical species and is very happy with the solver.

BTW, What kind of multiphase flow do you want to solve?

Regards.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2004, 13:00
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #3
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Sed,

Appreciate your information. In fact, I am trying to solve gas-liquid pipe flow, such as stratified, annular, and slug flow. More importantly, I am going to look at the interactions of entrained droplets with the gas either liquid phase. Now I am doubting that annular flow can be simulated by CFX or FLuent without model modifications, not to mention droplets. So, it's good to know that it is easier to set up UDF than user fortran.

Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2004, 13:13
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #4
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am in the model development group of a company that makes fuel for boiling water reactors. The pressures are at about 69 bar and the flow is annular. What we have found is that cfd codes will not handle annular flow. The major problem is that one of the major things about annular flow is that the deposition and pick up of droplets are controlled somewhat by the wave height. However, the wave height is about the magnitude of the numerical roundoff. If the code sees the wave at all, it thinks it is numerical diffusion and rounds it off. Therefore, empirical methods are necessary to simulate this regime. Regards, Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2004, 13:30
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #5
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tom,

I guess you are right. In order to catch the wave, it might be necessary to have very fine grids near the wall region. But for annular flow, even horizontal, it is believed that the unbalanced Reyolds stress caused secondary flow can carry liquid against all the way to the top of the pipe. The key here is that we have to use Reynolds stress model instead of k-e model. I guess the Reynolds stress model is not widely accepted for multiphase flow. But for vertical annular flow, the lateral dispersive forces are crutial to firm the liquid film around the pipe althouth the effects of these forces dispear for fully developed annular flow. My major concern is that all these physics are not reflected in the current two-fluid model. Although we may get some converged results using VOF, lot of details are missed out.

Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2004, 18:57
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #6
Seb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Paul,

for that kind of similation you are interested in, Fluent offers more than one multiphase models : drift-flux (slip model), VOF and complete euler-euler are available.

Did you give a look at FLOW3D? This code is specialized in multiphase flows. Good Luck.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2004, 04:10
Default Re: Multiphase flow modeling: CFX or FLUENT?
  #7
Jörn Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have a look at FOAM

http://www.nabla.co.uk

It is also free for academic use.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 6, 2010, 19:50
Default
  #8
Member
 
Casey
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 8
meangreen is on a distinguished road
MFIX is also free. Its not as user friendly, but if you know the physics and the general idea of CFD you will be fine.
meangreen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2012, 10:25
Default OpenFoam for Multiphase Solid-Gas Model
  #9
Senior Member
 
rkhr
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 209
Rep Power: 7
Kanarya is on a distinguished road
hi,

I would like to simulate circulating fertilized bed in OpenFoam...I am new in it.Could somebody tell me which solvers are available for this.

thanks in advance

Recep
Kanarya is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence modeling in CFX Chander CFX 11 April 12, 2012 04:32
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 03:43
CFX or Fluent which is better for impact modeling? didar Main CFD Forum 0 June 5, 2009 14:13
Reg: Modeling hub leakage flow in CFX venkataramanan.R CFX 3 February 21, 2007 08:46
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) DS & HB Main CFD Forum 0 January 8, 2000 16:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16.