CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulent fluctuation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 1, 2010, 21:47
Default Turbulent fluctuation
  #1
New Member
 
shooka k
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Shooka is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am working with a LES code which provides total velocity components(U and V). In order to seperate average u from fluctuating velocity, I have to use ensemble averaging, that should be on different realizations. I am a little confused, because the flow that I am working on is unsteady flow. In this case to seperate u and u' do I have to average in space?(look a little wierd to me, because it would smooth the velocity function instead)
Thank you in advance
Shooka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2010, 05:09
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Tomer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6
Avr.Tomer is on a distinguished road
LES formulation idea is about separting Large Eddies to DNS from small scale which will be modeled with some assumptions due to the closure problem (By separation I ment via wave number). On the other hand ensemble averaging under the assumption of ergodicity is somewhat the basics for URANS. the problem with the assumption is the basic flaw arrising from the ergodic theorem which actually makes the ensemble-average not time dependent.
Avr.Tomer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2010, 14:20
Default
  #3
New Member
 
shooka k
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Shooka is on a distinguished road
Is ergodic theorem valid for k-epsilon and even when there is no turbulent model applied on NS?
and for space averaging, for example for a shock wave, if averaging would be done on space, instead of finding ensemble averaged components we would end up changing flow structure.
Thanks again
Shooka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2010, 15:46
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Tomer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6
Avr.Tomer is on a distinguished road
Im not certain about what you mean by "ergodic theorem valid for k-e". The ergodic theorem applied to turbulence in one context mainly states that for a stationary flow (which is said to be valid for say turbulent flows) then in the formal limit of T-->infinity which must imply in time averaging, by applying the egodic theorem one may assume that time averaging equals ensemble averaging. then by ensemble averaging NS one gets what seems to be a time dependent equation and therefore by ergodic theorem a time dependent Reynolds decompositioned NS. Only what I claimed is that the ergodic theorem states just the opposite, meaning that the solution to ensemble averaged NS can not be time dependent because of its equality to time averaged solution.
My question is what kind of decomposition is used in order to achieve k-e (Reynolds, Hilbert, LES, etc...) and folowing that what is the justification for ensemble averaging?
By principle LES decomposition comprises spatial filtering and not spatial averaging hence saperating the flow to a large wave number part which fits small scales (SGS) to be modeled, and a low wave number part for large scales which is simulated via DNS.
Avr.Tomer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows Jade M CFX 6 January 26, 2013 11:11
Turbulent Dispersion for Coal Combustion gravis CFX 2 March 24, 2010 00:56
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel nuimlabib Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 2009 00:05
Turbulent inlet fluctuation scale christian OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 April 2, 2008 06:08
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:35.