CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

discretized form for advection term

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 2, 2004, 22:13
Default discretized form for advection term
  #1
jinfeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Anybody knows when to use conservative form for the advection term or non-conservative form by using finite difference method? For imcomprssible flow, it should be no different, am I right?

Thanks,

Jinfeng
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2004, 23:46
Default Re: discretized form for advection term
  #2
Junseok Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Even in incompressible flow, for the mass conservation conservative form is prefered.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2004, 02:52
Default Re: discretized form for advection term
  #3
Yticitrov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd say it all depend on your criteria for accuracy. If conservation is a criteria then the answer is most likely to use conservation form. There are non-conservative methods that yield space derivatives with smaller truncation error if that is a criteria.

Also it should be noted that although a method is conservative it does not necessarily imply accuracy. For instance, you can have an unstable solution that is still conservative.

/Y
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2004, 03:18
Default Re: discretized form for advection term
  #4
Junseok Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with you on that comment.

For example, high order Godunov type upwinding method and some ENO type are used, non-conservative form is naturally used.

But for the transport of density or volume-fraction, still conservative form is used to preserve conservation of those quantities.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2004, 06:04
Default Re: discretized form for advection term
  #5
Salvador
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, I think the choice depends on the problems. For compressible flows conservative forms finite volume schemes is the safest choice. Even using high order Godunov. Although with high order schemes it is a question of flavours. MPWENO, entropy-splitting, flux and slope limiters..you name it. In turbulence applications, some schems will dissipate more than others, destroying part of the information, other will dissipate less and therefore oscillate.

However, one question I would like to ask, what happened with the advection term in a non conservative equation?, i. e.

rdQ/dt + rvdQ/dx where v is a velocity conditioned on some variable, Q is a conditional scalar and r a conditional density, therefore dr/dt + d(rv)/dx is NOT zero

Which kind of discretization schemes will be suitable for this term?.

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
momentum source term zwdi FLUENT 13 December 5, 2013 18:58
Source term energy equation for reactive flows DaIN Main CFD Forum 0 October 6, 2011 15:11
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45
Derivation of Momentum Equation in Integral Form Demonwolf Main CFD Forum 2 October 29, 2009 20:53
bouyancy term in epsilon equation Michael Main CFD Forum 1 June 25, 1999 10:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:08.