CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Deciding Characteristic Length (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/81147-deciding-characteristic-length.html)

 Caner October 18, 2010 09:53

Deciding Characteristic Length

Hello everyone,
I am researching on jet impingement systems.I carry out numerical analysis to investigate flow field at the confined channel where dual jets impinge.I have a basic question about deciding characteristic length.

Basic drawing of my dual Nozzle can be seen here.There are 2 nozzles, one is(smaller diameter one-D1) in the another one(bigger diameter one-D2).
One of the parameter of my numerical simulation is Velocity ratio "VR" which means the ratio of V1 / V2.So in the case of VR=0,0.5,1.5,2,(which means V1 and V2 has a different velocity value) the question arises;

If there are two different velocities (V1 and V2) how should I determine the the characteristic length and Reynolds number in order to conduct numerical simulation?

Thank you very much in advance!

Regards,
Caner:)
http://rapidshare.com/files/425778304/nozzle1.jpg
http://rapidshare.com/files/425778304/nozzle1.jpg

 mettler October 20, 2010 09:03

can you not use the respective diameter of the nozzle to determine your Re?

and, since the mdot doesn't change I would use

Re = (4*mdot)/(mu*pi*Diam)

 Caner October 20, 2010 09:55

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mettler (Post 279968) can you not use the respective diameter of the nozzle to determine your Re? and, since the mdot doesn't change I would use Re = (4*mdot)/(mu*pi*Diam)
I think, I can use D2-D1 as a characteristic length in my numerical analysis like other annular impinging jet studies did, but that D2-D1 cant be used to determine inner jet's reynolds number.
and could you please explain what mdot is?

 mettler October 20, 2010 10:34

mdot is mass flow rate. I didn't see that diagram before my first post, so unless you know the mass flow rate thru the inner and outer channels you might not be able to use that.

 azurespirit December 2, 2010 15:33

determining diameter

Hi,

I am conducting investigations into impinging jets as well. Most literature gives Re values used. For purpose of validation, I need to mimic these exact conditions, for that I wanted to know how to deduce the diameter value using the provided Re number.

 dandalf December 3, 2010 07:30

Hi

Caner you could simply switch to using the dimensional form of the equaions, and calculate your flow in real space, rather than non dimensional space.

That way the viscous term of your equatons depends on viscosity rather than Re.

Azurespirit, it sounds like your bench mark solution is in non dimensionl form. In which case if you are solving with the dimensionless from of the equations, your velocity and charecteristic length will both be 1.

 mettler December 3, 2010 09:58

I think you just want to keep the Re the same - Reynolds Scaling, so you don't need to know any diameter or length. If you pick a diameter you will know what velocity you need to get the Re required.

 azurespirit December 3, 2010 11:35

@dandalf

i dont think i can consider both diameter and velocity as 1 since i wont possibly obtain the desired Re number

@mettler

yeah that's what i've figured. it basically scales down to Re=v.d/constant

so maintain a v/d ratio to get the desired Re. thanks anyway.

 dandalf December 3, 2010 12:32

Re is defined as,

presumably you are solving a set of continuity equations of the form,

Which is the dimensional form of the navier stokes equation for the conservation of momentum.
However, if you non dimensionalize this, i.e. set

giving the incompressible non dimensional from of of the equation,

this is the form of the equation found in many books, but is only valid if your computational domain has, characteristic distance 1, velocity 1, and density 1.

I got tripped up by this myself,

Most bench mark solutions will be presented in this dimensionless form for obvious reasons.

Hope this helped,

Dandalf

 Jade M December 9, 2010 12:04

I would use the length that gives you the largest Reynolds number and thus the smallest boundary layers. This way, I think that you can be sure to resolve all boundary layers. Good luck!

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:19.