CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Deciding Characteristic Length

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2010, 09:53
Default Deciding Characteristic Length
  #1
New Member
 
Caner
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
Caner is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
I am researching on jet impingement systems.I carry out numerical analysis to investigate flow field at the confined channel where dual jets impinge.I have a basic question about deciding characteristic length.

Basic drawing of my dual Nozzle can be seen here.There are 2 nozzles, one is(smaller diameter one-D1) in the another one(bigger diameter one-D2).
One of the parameter of my numerical simulation is Velocity ratio "VR" which means the ratio of V1 / V2.So in the case of VR=0,0.5,1.5,2,(which means V1 and V2 has a different velocity value) the question arises;

If there are two different velocities (V1 and V2) how should I determine the the characteristic length and Reynolds number in order to conduct numerical simulation?

Thank you very much in advance!

Regards,
Caner

Caner is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2010, 09:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
can you not use the respective diameter of the nozzle to determine your Re?

and, since the mdot doesn't change I would use

Re = (4*mdot)/(mu*pi*Diam)
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2010, 09:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Caner
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
Caner is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mettler View Post
can you not use the respective diameter of the nozzle to determine your Re?

and, since the mdot doesn't change I would use

Re = (4*mdot)/(mu*pi*Diam)
Thanks mettler for your answer
I think, I can use D2-D1 as a characteristic length in my numerical analysis like other annular impinging jet studies did, but that D2-D1 cant be used to determine inner jet's reynolds number.
and could you please explain what mdot is?
Caner is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2010, 10:34
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
mdot is mass flow rate. I didn't see that diagram before my first post, so unless you know the mass flow rate thru the inner and outer channels you might not be able to use that.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 2, 2010, 15:33
Default determining diameter
  #5
New Member
 
Shashank
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 7
azurespirit is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am conducting investigations into impinging jets as well. Most literature gives Re values used. For purpose of validation, I need to mimic these exact conditions, for that I wanted to know how to deduce the diameter value using the provided Re number.

The problem is both flow rate (or velocity) and diameter values are unknown, how can I go about this problem. Please help.
azurespirit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 07:30
Default
  #6
Member
 
Dan
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 6
dandalf is on a distinguished road
Hi

Caner you could simply switch to using the dimensional form of the equaions, and calculate your flow in real space, rather than non dimensional space.

That way the viscous term of your equatons depends on viscosity rather than Re.

Azurespirit, it sounds like your bench mark solution is in non dimensionl form. In which case if you are solving with the dimensionless from of the equations, your velocity and charecteristic length will both be 1.
dandalf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 09:58
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
I think you just want to keep the Re the same - Reynolds Scaling, so you don't need to know any diameter or length. If you pick a diameter you will know what velocity you need to get the Re required.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 11:35
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Shashank
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 7
azurespirit is on a distinguished road
@dandalf

i dont think i can consider both diameter and velocity as 1 since i wont possibly obtain the desired Re number

@mettler

yeah that's what i've figured. it basically scales down to Re=v.d/constant

so maintain a v/d ratio to get the desired Re. thanks anyway.
azurespirit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 12:32
Default
  #9
Member
 
Dan
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 6
dandalf is on a distinguished road
Re is defined as,
Re= \frac{\rho U D}{\mu}

presumably you are solving a set of continuity equations of the form,
\rho\left(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} + u_j\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}\right)=\mu\left(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}+\frac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_i} \right) - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x_i} - \rho g
Which is the dimensional form of the navier stokes equation for the conservation of momentum.
However, if you non dimensionalize this, i.e. set
\begin{array}{c} \rho=1\\ U =1 \\ D =1 \\ Re = \frac{1}{\mu}\end{array}

giving the incompressible non dimensional from of of the equation,

\left(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} + u_j\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}\right)=\frac{1}{Re}\left(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}+\frac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_i} \right) - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x_i} - g

this is the form of the equation found in many books, but is only valid if your computational domain has, characteristic distance 1, velocity 1, and density 1.

I got tripped up by this myself,

Most bench mark solutions will be presented in this dimensionless form for obvious reasons.

Hope this helped,

Dandalf
dandalf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2010, 12:04
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8
Jade M is on a distinguished road
I would use the length that gives you the largest Reynolds number and thus the smallest boundary layers. This way, I think that you can be sure to resolve all boundary layers. Good luck!
Jade M is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulent Characteristic Length/Turbulent Length Scale fluentnoob FLUENT 2 July 3, 2009 08:40
Characteristic length scale Linfeng Main CFD Forum 0 January 9, 2004 23:51
characteristic Length CFD MAN Main CFD Forum 3 September 11, 2002 07:26
Characteristic Length CFD MAN FLUENT 0 August 19, 2002 21:40
Characteristic Length Scale Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 2 April 20, 1999 17:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46.