CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Area weighted or mass weighted average

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree9Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 31, 2011, 07:13
Smile area weighted or mass weighted average
  #21
New Member
 
Amit Chauhan
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 8
chauhan is on a distinguished road
thank you sir... thank you very much.
chauhan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2013, 16:10
Default
  #22
Senior Member
 
immortality's Avatar
 
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,209
Rep Power: 18
immortality is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jola View Post
Area-averaging and mass-averaging will give different results and what you should use depends on what variable you are interested in. For conserved variables like total-pressure you should use mass-averaging, whereas for other variables, like static-pressure, you should use area-averaging. Check out some of the refences mentioned.

To make things even more complex another type of averaging often used is flux-averaging. With flux-averaging all gradients are mixed out and a flux-averaged value is the value you would get if you measure at the outlet of an infinently long friction-free pipe put at the boundary. In turbomachinery applications flux-averaging is common, and sometimes you do not flux-average everything, you do flux-averaging circumferentially to mix-out wakes, but you do not do flux-averaging radially because you do not want to mix-out the end-wall boundary layers.
hello
what do you mean by a conserved variable exactly?
is a scalar transport variable conserved?I have mixed up with a conserved variable and a conserved equation.
thank you.
adnanghreeb likes this.
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King.
To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question!
The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked.
immortality is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2014, 06:19
Default
  #23
New Member
 
adnan
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 4
adnanghreeb is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jola View Post
Area-averaging and mass-averaging will give different results and what you should use depends on what variable you are interested in. For conserved variables like total-pressure you should use mass-averaging, whereas for other variables, like static-pressure, you should use area-averaging. Check out some of the refences mentioned.

To make things even more complex another type of averaging often used is flux-averaging. With flux-averaging all gradients are mixed out and a flux-averaged value is the value you would get if you measure at the outlet of an infinently long friction-free pipe put at the boundary. In turbomachinery applications flux-averaging is common, and sometimes you do not flux-average everything, you do flux-averaging circumferentially to mix-out wakes, but you do not do flux-averaging radially because you do not want to mix-out the end-wall boundary layers.
Dear Sir, I have in my project mixing chamber CO2 with air (with different temperature ) but mass fraction for CO2 very small when try to find static temperature or total temp. by mass - averaging different if I find it by area - averaging, and my project incompressible flow
I interested to find temperature.

Thanks in advance
adnanghreeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2014, 13:37
Default
  #24
New Member
 
adnan
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 4
adnanghreeb is on a distinguished road
Dear friends, I have in my project mixing chamber CO2 with air (with different temperature ) but mass fraction for CO2 very small when try to find static temperature or total temp. by mass - averaging different if I find it by area - averaging, and my project incompressible flow
I interested to find temperature.

Thanks in advance
adnanghreeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2015, 06:15
Default
  #25
Member
 
Shane
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8
sircorp is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan Rusås
;31045
Regarding the average methode for pressure, you can find that from the energy equation. It should actually be volume flow averaged, but if the density is constant you can use mass flow average. Only if the velocity is near constant, same mass flow at each position, will result in same value for mass flow and area average.
The energy equation is a function of Velocity across the surface area. Should one calculated the Pressure and velocity average over the Surface Area for energy & heat transfer calculations ?
sircorp is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Diffference between mass weighted average and Area giogio FLUENT 4 September 25, 2012 01:36
CFX Solver Memory Error mike CFX 1 March 19, 2008 08:22
mass weighted or area weighted wilson FLUENT 1 August 9, 2006 10:34
area weighted average Sireesha Pasari FLUENT 1 April 4, 2004 13:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:19.