CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Area weighted or mass weighted average

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree8Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 1, 2004, 04:01
Default Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #1
SAM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wonder wat is difference b/w the area weighted and mass weighted average values of any varaible.

and which one is better to use and in what type of situations

Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2004, 08:33
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #2
Apurva
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

For pressure use area weighted averaged value. For rest mass averaged is fine.

Thanks

Apurva
sircorp likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2004, 10:55
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #3
Jon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Won't this depend on the profile through your boundary?

If you want ave vel. you want area ave, if you want ave. temp. you will want Mf ave.
sircorp likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 2, 2004, 17:44
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #4
centaur_ks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
consult. "Computational Fluid Dynamics" - T J Chung. This things are better explained in that. hope this helps
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 02:55
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #5
Jan Rusås
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For incompressible flow it is physical correct to use mass average for the pressure. For velocities you should use area weighted. You can also do a search in the forum, it has been discussed before.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 03:21
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #6
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thank i will look into it

but any body else can give me more suggestion , coz my experience says that both normally gives same resutls
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 03:33
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #7
Junseok Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Take a look at below paper.

Junseok

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2003; 41:551–560 (DOI: 10.1002/d.455) Interfacial transfer in Tryggvason's method Joel H. Ferziger∗; † Department of Mechanical Engineering; Stanford University; Stanford CA; U.S.A. SUMMARY Tryggvason's method computes two phase ows by smoothing the regions near the boundaries between the two uids. This requires averaging of the uid properties, which may dier by orders of magnitude and can lead to large errors. Traditional linear averaging produces a rst order error that can be extremely large. In this paper, we show that for a number of simple test cases, averaging of the inverses of the properties can lead to a signicant improvement in the quality of the results.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 04:31
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #8
Jan Rusås
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Regarding the average methode for pressure, you can find that from the energy equation. It should actually be volume flow averaged, but if the density is constant you can use mass flow average. Only if the velocity is near constant, same mass flow at each position, will result in same value for mass flow and area average.
sircorp likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 05:29
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #9
Jon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If the flow is reasonably spatially constant w.r.t. the variable you are intersted in AND the velocity then both will be similar.

If not, see above.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 09:33
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #10
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
in fluent how can we take the inverse (as stated in above mentioned paper )

I will grateful to u for ur help

Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 09:35
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #11
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
can u send me papers or any refernce in fluent users guide .

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2004, 11:42
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #12
Junseok Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't use fluent.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2004, 02:30
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #13
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OR DO U HAVE ANY REFERECNE
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2004, 07:00
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #14
deepesh nanda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear friend, U use area weighted avg. when ever u r using incompressible flow. The reason is that the density of the fuild is constant from inlet to outlet and hence area weigh. avg. will do. But for incompressible flow the density vary with temp and pressure and hence during that time u should used mass weight avg. All the best. with regards deepesh
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2004, 11:59
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #15
SAM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks for ur reply

but i have to give reason for this in my thesis , could u please give some references

i will be grateful to u

regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2004, 07:53
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #16
deepesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Buddy, If u r using fluent software then u can go to the fluent help file where they clearly give the difference and the reason for the same. By chance if u do not have the same, mail me, i will mail the required document.

all the best,

deepesh nanda
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2004, 07:54
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #17
SAM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
please mail me
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2004, 11:16
Default Re: Area weighted or mass weighted average
  #18
deepesh nanda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Correction,

I replied for the area/mass weight avg, u use mass weight avg. only when u have compressible flow becoz. density varies with pressure and temperature for such flow. i will soon mail u the document.

thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2011, 02:40
Exclamation area weighted or mass weighted average
  #19
New Member
 
amit kumar chauhan
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
chauhanji is on a distinguished road
I have tried for both area weighted and mass weighted average for my problem. And I am giving incompressible flow, still the averages values are not same which contradicts many of u all posts here above.
Can any one please counter check and tell us what is the reason and with correct explanation.
chauhanji is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2011, 06:31
Default
  #20
Administrator
 
jola's Avatar
 
Jonas Larsson
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 171
Rep Power: 10
jola is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to jola Send a message via Skype™ to jola
Area-averaging and mass-averaging will give different results and what you should use depends on what variable you are interested in. For conserved variables like total-pressure you should use mass-averaging, whereas for other variables, like static-pressure, you should use area-averaging. Check out some of the refences mentioned.

To make things even more complex another type of averaging often used is flux-averaging. With flux-averaging all gradients are mixed out and a flux-averaged value is the value you would get if you measure at the outlet of an infinently long friction-free pipe put at the boundary. In turbomachinery applications flux-averaging is common, and sometimes you do not flux-average everything, you do flux-averaging circumferentially to mix-out wakes, but you do not do flux-averaging radially because you do not want to mix-out the end-wall boundary layers.
Far, jonny_b, sircorp and 1 others like this.
jola is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Diffference between mass weighted average and Area giogio FLUENT 4 September 25, 2012 01:36
CFX Solver Memory Error mike CFX 1 March 19, 2008 08:22
mass weighted or area weighted wilson FLUENT 1 August 9, 2006 10:34
area weighted average Sireesha Pasari FLUENT 1 April 4, 2004 13:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:46.