# Lattice-Boltzman

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 1, 2004, 17:26 Lattice-Boltzman #1 Mohammad Kazemi Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Everybody, I am an engineer working for an industrial company and I am currently researching on available CFD codes in the market for the problem of air-flow between a pair of co-rotating disks in a HDD. I have good experience in developing my own code by I have little knowledge about the commercial codes in the market. I have heard of Fluent, which is said to be the best, and PowerFlow, which incorporates Lattice-Boltzman method. Does anybody know whether Lattice-Boltzman method is as efficient as the traditional method (solving discretized forms of N-S equations) in capturing flow phenomena? What are the advantages and disadvantages of Lattice-Boltzman method compared to the traditional method. I would really appreciate your help in this regard. Regards Mohammad

 October 1, 2004, 18:18 Re: Lattice-Boltzman #2 Junseok Kim Guest   Posts: n/a Advantages of the LBM is that it is good for complecated geometries such as porous material. And it is mesoscale, so it may be good to use LBM in HDD simulation, because the thin region between the disk, N-S equations may not be valid, instead you may use kinetic based LBM.

 October 1, 2004, 20:50 Re: Lattice-Boltzman #3 noName Guest   Posts: n/a Mohammad, You should look into a former CML student's thesis: A Study of Rarefied and Contact Air Bearing Modeling for Hard Disk Drives Using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Method, Weidong Huang, Doctoral Dissertation, December 1998.

 October 1, 2004, 21:33 Re: Lattice-Boltzman #4 noName Guest   Posts: n/a Found a link to the paper: http://www.algarcia.org/Pubs/Slider3D97.pdf

 October 9, 2004, 00:45 Re: Lattice-Boltzman #5 Qu Kun Guest   Posts: n/a In the mesoscale field£¬LBM should be a good selection. But in the field of macro-flow, I think LBM is not better than traditional CFD method like FEM or FVM. Only one advantage, it has a feature of rotating invariant, which is a very good characteristic for flow with abundant vortexes.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Halim Main CFD Forum 24 October 27, 2016 06:16 amaal Hardware 0 January 18, 2011 12:14 gholamghar Main CFD Forum 1 February 19, 2010 06:38 Joseph Bergevin Main CFD Forum 1 January 25, 2006 15:56 Rob Kunz Main CFD Forum 2 October 15, 2003 09:31

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:58.