|
[Sponsors] |
October 7, 2004, 10:11 |
Question of order
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK, so I'm running some Re numbers on a short pipe. The pipe has both a constiction (of 7 to 1 d1 to d2) and a bend (of varying degrees). What is the best way to approch the problem? Should I use equivilent lengths? And if so, do I start with the first diameter and then add the equivilent length for the constriction and the bend? Should I Calculate the constriction first and then the bend? Or Bend and then constriction?
Thanks for taking the time to read and reply, Nick |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 12:29 |
IS calc. with 2nd order discret. always necessary? | Azman | FLUENT | 2 | March 14, 2013 04:28 |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 08:21 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 01:50 |
2nd order conservative schemes | taw | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 16, 2008 07:05 |