CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

3D mesh for transient flow around wing section?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 30, 2010, 11:36
Default 3D mesh for transient flow around wing section?
  #1
New Member
 
Lukas
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6
Nixmich is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
I want to simulate the flow around a wing section which was generated by extruding an airfoil. The airfoil has a blunt trailing edge so transient effects occur. Does anybody know if it makes sense to simulate the flow in 3d in order to better capture these transient effects and if yes, how high the mesh resolution in the direction of the extrusion should be (hexa mesh)?
Thanks in advance!
Nixmich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2010, 04:26
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Lukas
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6
Nixmich is on a distinguished road
ok now I just tried it, 2 weeks calculation obtaining asymmetric results, positive lift coeffecient on one side and negative on the other side, adding up to nearly zero which is far from reality...
Nixmich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2010, 07:11
Default
  #3
Member
 
D
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 6
bhatiadinesh is on a distinguished road
What are the boundary conditions you have used at the ends which are perpendicular to the plane of airfoil, the discrepancy might be due to incorect boundary conditions !!
bhatiadinesh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2010, 08:03
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Lukas
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6
Nixmich is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the answer!
Actually I simulated the whole wind tunnel as used for the measurements I want to compare the CFD results to, in order to see to what extent the wind tunnel walls influence the flow around the airfoil.
So this is the setup:
-rectangular inlet with constant normal speed
-empty wind tunnel section with free slip walls, ~1/3 of the overall length
-middle section of the wind tunnel containing the airfoil, no slip walls, ~1/3 of the overall length
-empty wind tunnel section with free slip walls, ~1/3 of the overall length
-opening with constant relative pressure (0Pa, reference pressure 1atm)
The whole setup is absolutely symmetric (I checked this about a thousand times), so I have no idea why the flow shouldn't be symmetric as well. Apparently Ansys gets something wrong about the transition point, as the flow separates from the airfoil at about 0.5c on the one and not at all on the other side of the tunnel...
Nixmich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2010, 01:26
Default
  #5
Member
 
D
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 6
bhatiadinesh is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Have you checked your mesh geometry for symmetry ? ( I am confused whether u were mentioning the actual one or the model earlier ) , check for symmetry of boundary condtions as well, I mean u must have forgotten to provide free slip or any other paramter on some of the walls.

Also check the Inlet and Exit Pressure Pressure and velocity profiles for asymmetry.

Traverse from Inlet to the airfoil/wing/blade and view pressure and velocity profiles in planes parallel to the inlet to see where the uniformity starts generating, at the tunnel walls or between them.

YOU CAN DETECT PROBLEMS IN UR INPUTS BY ANALYSING THE RESULTS ESPECIALLY IF U HAVE SOME IDEA OF HOW THE RESULTS SHOULD BE.

I Hope ur tunnel section is not curved ( Pardon me if u have laready mentioned that, I couldnt read the whole stuff )

-Dinesh
bhatiadinesh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2011, 04:00
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Lukas
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6
Nixmich is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhatiadinesh View Post
Have you checked your mesh geometry for symmetry ?
yeah thats what i meant by saying i'd checked it over and over again
boundary conditions should be ok as well.

the "problem" seems to start at one of the side walls around the area where the boundary condition changes from free slip wall to no slip wall. u decreases more rapidly in a certain area in front of the airfoil on one side than on the other (dont know whether this is due to the boundary layer at the side wall or to effects from the airfoil). this is the point i dont understand because the conditions are exactly the same on either side.

i'll try again with free slip tunnel walls as soon as i can spare another 2 weeks computation time, although i expect that the flow will stay attached in this case leading to far too high cl (this is what comes out if i run a 2d/1cell thickness simulation, and this is also why i initially started this thread, to find out if anybody knows if there is any difference between 2d and extrusion to 3d)
Nixmich is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
[GAMBIT] multi element wing - mesh problem Zweeper ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 19 March 30, 2010 00:55
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05
Mesh for 3 dim Geometry Phil FLUENT 9 July 12, 2000 04:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:45.