|December 16, 2010, 05:10||
Convergence of laminar flow model for high Re
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 171Rep Power: 5
If I understand correctly, the laminar solution of Navier stokes equations is valid for all Re. Then why do commercial solvers like CFX are notable to converge above a certain Re (like 2300 for pipe flow) with laminar flow assumption. I understand the solution may not be entirely physical (as it takes special care to maintain laminar flow at high Re in experiments and normally flow becomes turbulent) but still it is a solution of the governing equations.
Please explain !
|laminar flow, turbulent flow|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Using a turbulent model when the flow is entirely laminar.||mwhyte||FLUENT||1||June 7, 2012 10:35|
|Laminar Pipe Flow convergence issues||preichl||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||10||February 25, 2010 05:01|
|How to enforce laminar flow while using k-e||Grzegorz Kondora||FLUENT||0||January 28, 2009 10:35|
|Validation for laminar Disperse phase flow||shashwat||Main CFD Forum||0||April 4, 2008 02:20|
|The difference between Laminar model and DNS at lo||fpz||FLUENT||3||March 14, 2005 06:33|