CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Some questions about incompressible flow,thx!

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 28, 2010, 20:52
Default Some questions about incompressible flow,thx!
  #1
New Member
 
Aladdin
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16
aladdincham is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,
i got some words on a book, but i cannot understood them very well, it said "In the low speed fluid and gas,they are treated as imcompressible flow.There was no change in the density,so there is no relationship between momentum equations and mass conservation equations".
Well ,my question is ,why?
THX!
aladdincham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2010, 02:59
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Alexey
Join Date: May 2009
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
ignat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aladdincham View Post
Hi guys,
i got some words on a book, but i cannot understood them very well, it said "In the low speed fluid and gas,they are treated as imcompressible flow.There was no change in the density,so there is no relationship between momentum equations and mass conservation equations".
Well ,my question is ,why?
THX!
It is true. It's possible to explain it so.
It is known from compressible gasdynamic theory that
density depends on Mach number M as
\rho = \rho_0 (1+\frac{\gamma -1}{2}M^2)^{-\frac{1}{\gamma-1}}
where \gamma is the specific heat ratio,
\rho_0=const is the stagnation density,
M = \frac{u}{c}
where u is the velocity and c is the speed of sound.

Thus, when the maximum M (and maximum u) tends to zero, density becomes independent of u and M and may be treated as constant. In practice when maximum M < 0.1 flow may be considered as incompressible.
ignat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2010, 21:21
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Aladdin
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16
aladdincham is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ignat View Post
It is true. It's possible to explain it so.
It is known from compressible gasdynamic theory that
density depends on Mach number M as
\rho = \rho_0 (1+\frac{\gamma -1}{2}M^2)^{-\frac{1}{\gamma-1}}
where \gamma is the specific heat ratio,
\rho_0=const is the stagnation density,
M = \frac{u}{c}
where u is the velocity and c is the speed of sound.

Thus, when the maximum M (and maximum u) tends to zero, density becomes independent of u and M and may be treated as constant. In practice when maximum M < 0.1 flow may be considered as incompressible.
Thanks for your reply, i think i make some mistake,the words are“In the low speed fluid and gas,they are treated as imcompressible flow.There was no change in the density,so momentum equations & mass conservation equations are no relationship with energy equations
WHY?
aladdincham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2010, 06:01
Default
  #4
otd
Member
 
private
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 17
otd is on a distinguished road
With density constant, momentum and conservation depend only on velocities and pressure. In 3-d flow, that's (for example) u, v, w, and p. With 3 momentum eqs. and continuity, that's 4 equations and 4 unknowns. They can (and are) solved without reference to Temperature, internal energy, etc.

Knowing u, v, w, p, etc, the energy equation is one equation in one unknown (temperature, internal energy, enthalpy, etc depending on the form you select for the equation).

It might be better to say "the momentum equations are independent of the temperature" but temperature depends on the momentum and pressure.

Some other folks might say the coupling between momentum-continuity and energy is one-way only.

That thing about 'no relationship' is sort of confusing.

Hope this helps,

OTD
otd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2010, 06:46
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Alexey
Join Date: May 2009
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
ignat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aladdincham View Post
There was no change in the density,so momentum equations & mass conservation equations are no relationship with energy equations
WHY?
It follows from non-dimensional form of energy equation.
Let non-dimensional pressure be:
p=\frac{p-p_0}{\rho_r u_r^2}
where p_0 is the constant background pressure, \rho_r is the reference density and u_r is the reference velocity.

then the energy equation in non-dimensional form can be written as

M_r^2 \{  \frac{\partial }{\partial t} [p+(\gamma-1)\rho u^i u^i/2 ]    + [u^k (\gamma p+(\gamma-1)\rho u^i u^i/2) ]_{,k}\}+u_{,k}^k=0

Here
M_r=\frac{u_r}{\sqrt{\gamma p_0 / \rho_r}} is the reference Mach number.
If M_r tends to zero then the energy equation coincides with continuity equation div(u)=0!

Thus energy equation in itself "disappears" for incompressible flows (M->0)!

Therefore "momentum equations & mass conservation equations are no relationship with energy equations"

Details see for example in Wesseling's papers
1. van der Heul DR, Vuik C, Wesseling P. A conservative pressure correction method for compressible flow at all speeds.// Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 2002, v. 40, pp. 521-529.

2. I. Wenneker, A. Segal and P. Wesseling. A Mach-uniform unstructured grid method. // Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 2002, v. 40, pp. 1209-1235.
ignat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2010, 22:34
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Aladdin
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16
aladdincham is on a distinguished road
thanks for your reply, i got the quetion`s answer, your answer is very clear.
aladdincham is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incompressible Ideal gas law Leverkin FLUENT 5 March 5, 2009 16:41
Abt: the speed of sound in incompressible flows jinwon park Main CFD Forum 3 August 21, 2008 20:44
Unsteady incompressible flow in a duct - questions Sam Main CFD Forum 3 February 22, 2006 08:04
What is the total energy for incompressible fluid? Harry Dong Main CFD Forum 12 February 4, 2006 00:55
Compressible vs. Incompressible formulations Fernando Velasco Hurtado Main CFD Forum 3 January 7, 2000 16:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55.