|
[Sponsors] |
January 12, 2011, 16:56 |
Computing standards
|
#1 |
New Member
Brian
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am developing an algorithm generally applicable to CFD methods and I would like a professional opinion as to the relevance of my results so far. I am not seeking technical assistance with any sort of development, I would simply like to know if the work I have been doing is worth pursuing further.
As a test case I have a solution to Burgers equation with the initial conditions: u = 5 + cos(2pi*x) Calculated on a periodic grid no larger than N=40 and using an effective (maximum) Courant number of at least 9 up to just before the singularity my method produces errors on the order of 10^-5. I think it is promising but I am not so well versed in CFD methods that I trust my own opinion to know how this compares to the plethora of methods already available. I would like to know if a method that produces this sort of stable result is worth pursuing or at least what standard i might judge my methods against (i.e. what a better test case would entail or what would qualify as an impressive achievement in CFL number or error). |
|
January 12, 2011, 20:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 16 |
you will probably have already read it, but migh i suggest the book Reiman solvers and numerical methods for cfd
the author is E.Toro. you might find some decent comparison and testcases. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem during my computing | oliver | FLUENT | 0 | May 31, 2007 08:35 |
CFD algorithm design with reconfigurable computing | Beatríz Navarro | CFX | 4 | June 27, 2006 04:39 |
CFD algorithm design with reconfigurable computing | Beatríz Navarro | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 25, 2006 14:25 |
CFD algorithm design with reconfigurable computing | Beatríz Navarro | Fidelity CFD | 0 | June 24, 2006 18:23 |
CFD algorithm design with reconfigurable computing | Beatríz Navarro | FLUENT | 0 | June 24, 2006 18:22 |