# Standard k-e model in Lid driven cavity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 4, 2011, 06:00 Standard k-e model in Lid driven cavity #1 New Member   Rajesh Kumar Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 24 Rep Power: 9 Hi I have recently written code for solving 2-D Lid Driven Cavity using SIMPLE algorithm and Finite Volume Method discretisation for the Laminar case. Now I want to solve the same problem for turbulence case. can somebody guide me and tell me the Governing equations in 2-d and how to model that using standard k-e model.how many turbulent stress terms need to be modelled in RANS equation. Thank You Rajesh

 February 5, 2011, 19:03 #2 Senior Member   Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 411 Rep Power: 11 For incompressible turbulent flows your equations will be basically the same, except for the viscosity which is composed by the sum of laminar and turbulent viscosity. Google for Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes equation, or use this link: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Intro...aged_equations Do

 February 10, 2011, 06:07 #3 New Member   Rajesh Kumar Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 24 Rep Power: 9 Thank You. Mr. DoHander In 2D RANS equations there are three unknown Reynolds Stress terms.Is it necessary to model each three terms or just model the rho*u'v' term. Thanks Rajesh

 February 10, 2011, 08:34 #4 Senior Member   Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 411 Rep Power: 11 Use the Boussinesq approximation (this will reduce the number of Reynolds stresses) and the ke turbulence model. Check this book (second edition), you will find the equation you need: Anderson DA Tannehill JC Pletcher RH. Computational Fluid Mechanics And Heat Transfer Do

 February 11, 2011, 03:18 #5 New Member   Rajesh Kumar Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 24 Rep Power: 9 After using Boussinesq approximationin x-momentum equation equation changes are as given below meu_laminar is changes to (meu_laminar+meu_turbulent) u and v is relaced by U and V Extra term is generated -(2/3)*rho*k How to model the extra model term -(2/3)*rho*k. Should I treat this term like the pressure difference term in momentum equation. In the Pletcher book final equation after putting boussinesq equation is not given. Thanks Rajesh

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36 rt Main CFD Forum 3 April 1, 2006 09:27 liaolingling FLUENT 0 April 27, 2005 04:24 Azfarizal B Mukhtar Main CFD Forum 0 August 12, 2004 10:26 C. ORTEGA FLUENT 0 July 7, 2003 08:35

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46.