CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Fluent Vs Star CCM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2011, 12:00
Default Fluent Vs Star CCM
  #1
New Member
 
Firdaus
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
firda is on a distinguished road
Hi,.
Anyone can explain me why results from Fluent simulation is little bit difference with Star CCM. For example,result for Drag coefficient, Fluent gives 0.026 and Star CCM gives 0.016. I have try so many times with fluent, and the result still the same. The parameters that i used for both CFD engines are the same (ex:mach no=0.1,surface ref.area and temperature). What i noticed the difference between Fluent and Star CCM is the solver used. fluent used Coupled Explicit and StarCCM used Segregated Solver. Since Fluent also has the Segregated Implicit solver, i have tried running the simulation using this solver and unfortunately the result that i got higher than using Coupled Explicit solver. So, it is because of the solver the result given by Fluent and Star CCM give a bit difference.FYI, this simulation is for UAV aircraft.
firda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2011, 13:02
Default
  #2
Member
 
Vinicius Girardi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
Vinicius is on a distinguished road
You can also compare the STAR-CCM+ Coupled solver to see what happens.
for low Mach number I believe the STAR-CCM+ segregated solver with Ideal gas Model (compressible) can capture what you need much faster then Fluent Coupled solver or Fluent segregated solver with compressibility (guess it is NITA).

Are you using the same mesh for both?
Vinicius is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2011, 01:47
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Vasiliy
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6
Vasiliy is on a distinguished road
Actually, you need to use couple solver in both simulations to obtain correct solution. Differences that you have looks strange - they are too large. Probably there is convergence problem in CCM or Fluent
Vasiliy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2011, 03:51
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Firdaus
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
firda is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinicius View Post
You can also compare the STAR-CCM+ Coupled solver to see what happens.
for low Mach number I believe the STAR-CCM+ segregated solver with Ideal gas Model (compressible) can capture what you need much faster then Fluent Coupled solver or Fluent segregated solver with compressibility (guess it is NITA).

Are you using the same mesh for both?
Vinicius;
Thank You for your reply,i dont know either STAR CCM have the coupled solver or not since i only have experience with Fluent.Then, for the mesh, in Fluent i used Tetrahedral meshing and in Star CCM with polyhedral meshing.I have no idea why it give very huge different in result, but FYI, in fluent i also doing Grid Indipendent Study range from 300K to 1.5M cells and the result is independent at 0.026.Maybe, i can try your solution.
firda is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh from Star Design in FLUENT Waseem CD-adapco 0 December 17, 2008 07:24
mesh algo for volume mesh in star ccm rohit CD-adapco 1 August 8, 2008 20:44
Star or Fluent ? greg CD-adapco 0 March 1, 2006 05:44
Convert FLUENT mesh to some other format for STAR? Jiaying Xu FLUENT 3 December 5, 2002 09:15
Fluent vs. CFX vs. Star CD Sam Main CFD Forum 2 November 22, 2000 05:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15.