CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

confused with Darcy and Fanning

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 14, 2005, 11:53
Default confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #1
queram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hello guys, I am doing some research and have realized there`s nice turmoil in the definiton of pipe wall friction factor. One defines it as f=8*tau/rho/u^2, another one as f=2*tau/rho/u^2 (due to Fanning`s use of hydraulic radius in the equations of head loss instead of hydraulic diameter). That means, for gas in pipe, hydraulic radius is only half of geometrical radius, while, for the same gas in the same pipe, hydraulic diameter is the same as geometrical diameter. For me, this means Fanning`s statement is against common sense and there`s no reason to follow him. But, many follow him. Whehther f for laminar flow 16/Re or 64/Re is only the minor problem. Thousands of another equations for f that can be found in two versions with different coeffs....... a bit greater problem. But what really irritates me, is that two men are using the momentum equation of 1D unsteady compressible gas flow in the same form, with friction member defined in the same way (G=2/D*u*abs(u)*f) and one of them takes f according Fanning and the second one according to Darcy. Who the hell is right??
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2005, 12:20
Default Re: confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #2
Angen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We have no choice but live with that. There is an article by Churchil in Chem.Eng.Prog.(~1960 or so) that makes some order with all these definitions.

Angen
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2005, 04:04
Default Re: confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #3
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
queram,

I think it is merely a matter of nondimensionalization. The dimensional momentum equation is <html>

<head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1255"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)"> <title> </title>

<style>

</style>

</head>

<body lang=EN-US>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify;direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:embed'><span style='font-family:Symbol'>r</span> Du<sub>i</sub>/Dt = div (<span style='font-family:Symbol'>s</span><sub>ij</sub>) + <span style='font-family: Symbol'>r</span> G<sub>i</sub>


</div>

</body>

</html>

If you consistently non-dimensionalize it, you should get the appropriate nondimensional stress terms and then compare them to those resulting from the wall friction factors (which themselves are merely non-dimensional stress factors).

I hope this will clarify your doubts,

Rami
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2005, 11:34
Default Re: confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #4
queram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well guys... as I`m looking at it again and again... where do you think the problem itself originates: 1. in Fanning`s use of hydraulic radius as characteristic dimension or, 2. confusion in the use of terms "friction factor" (related to pressure drop, also called head loss coeff.) and "friction coeff" (related surface drag / surface roughness)
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2005, 04:11
Default Re: confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #5
queram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well, I`ll put the self-answer: the main problem lies in the misuse of terms "friction factor" and "friction coefficient"; both are usually denoted as f, Cf or lambda, one is related to aerodynamic drag of the wall surface roughness, while the another one is related to pressure loss due to friction. Therefore, I suggest to use the clear and unambigious term when talking about friction: you mean friction? talk/write about friction coefficient, sucinitel trenia. you mean pressure loss? talk/write about friction loss coeff, head loss coeff or sucinitel tlakovej straty
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2005, 16:26
Default Re: confused with Darcy and Fanning
  #6
mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
R=D/4....further reading http://biosystems.okstate.edu/darcy/...achHistory.htm
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44.