|
[Sponsors] |
September 9, 2019, 09:50 |
Massflow vs. Velocity
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello everybody,
i have a simple question: is there any difference in CFD using massflow inlet or velocity inlet? People told me that with a massflow inlet i get better results and its more stable than using velocity inlet. Is that truth? is there any reasonable explanation for it? Thanks! Science2108 |
|
September 9, 2019, 10:11 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Carlo_P
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 7 |
I would suggest you to use velocity.
It is more accurate, since your solver don't have to calculate the area. If your mesh is not good enought, you can have an huge error. This is my opinion... On the other hand, engineering factories normally speaks on massflowrate kg/h. What other peolple think about? |
|
September 9, 2019, 11:31 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71 |
As a general observation, prescribing only the mass flow rate does not say nothing about the shape of the velocity profile. It can adjust from the interior condition, a case that is suitable for the subsonic compressible flows.
For the incompressible flows, setting the velocity inlet profile works well. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet | Mike_Tom | CFX | 6 | September 29, 2016 01:27 |
LES and TKE calculations | MST | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 30, 2016 06:26 |
Radial velocity and tangential velocity on centrifugal fan, | johnnyp | FLUENT | 2 | May 24, 2013 07:10 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 09:11 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 05:13 |