CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Fidap 7.63: species Concentration

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 30, 1999, 22:25
Default Fidap 7.63: species Concentration
  #1
Lisa Eastep
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This question is for those of you who use CFD for reaction models. I am working with Fidap 7.63 on a Dec Alpha workstation, modeling a combustion reaction with turbulent fluid flow. For a converged simulation, the sum of all of the species concentrations for a specific element (actually, for a lot of elements) was greater than 1 (about 1.3). The manuals for this program states that species concentrations are expressed as mass fractions. However, I know that realistically a sum of all mass fractions cannot be greater than 1. Technical suppart at Fidap says that that having a sum greater than 1 is possible (for the software). My question is this: what do the results mean, realistically? How can the species' concentration values be interpreted in order to make sense?

Thanks,

Lisa Eastep
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 1999, 23:58
Default Re: Fidap 7.63: species Concentration
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). You have to obtain the so-called mesh-independent solution first, before you can evaluate the converged solution. (2). Pick some recently published CFD papers from ASME/Journal of Fluid Engineering or AIAA Journal, and study how other researchers are doing in this area first. (3). Remember that, if you are using a commercial code, there is a very long way to go. (4). To learn CFD, you must learn how to write your own code. Then you will be able to ask the right question. (5). Only the code vendor knows what is in the code, and only you know what you are doing with the code. It is like asking " How come my phone bill last month is so high? " There are only three parties involved: the phone company, the phone and you. (6). The problem has nothing to do with CFD at all, it is the relationship between the code vendor, the code and you. Very simple. To become a CFD problem, you have to be able to obtain at least the mesh-independent solution first.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 1999, 14:32
Default Re: Fidap 7.63: species Concentration
  #3
Eric Grald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Lisa,

You are correct in stating that the sum of the mass fractions should be 1. However, it is well-known that the finite element method, upon which FIDAP is based, can produce "wiggles" in areas where there are strong gradients and the mesh is under-resolved. These wiggles are undershoots and overshoots of the actual solution and hence you might see mass fractions of -0.01 or 1.03, etc. A value of 1.3 sounds a little excessive.

If you'll send me your .FDREAD file, I'd be happy to have someone take another look at it.

Regards,

Eric Grald, Fluent Inc.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 1999, 10:10
Default Re: Fidap 7.63: species Concentration
  #4
Alexey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello, Lisa.

It means that the approximation errors are very big. Try to use finest mesh and less Courant number.

Alexey.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 1999, 20:03
Default Re: Fidap 7.63: species Concentration
  #5
Md. Ziaul Islam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Lisa,

Forward and reverse reaction rates are functions of temperatures. When you add these reaction rates in turbulence model, it is obvious that the results may act wild because reaction rates are wild. Many computational techniques are being developed now-a-days to treat detailed chemistry in reactive flow calculations. Theoretically, the sum of mass fractions should be equal to 1. Most reactions rates are obtained experimentally in the laboratory so that there are chances of error in calculations. Species concentrations are obtained using these reaction rates. You are getting the accumulation of errors. When reactions rates are added to the equations, it is hard to converge the equations as much as required to get better results. You are saying that you are working on a converged problem. I would recommend you to try to use smaller convergence criteria. It may be the reason why you have all these errors. There is nothing wrong with the software. Finally, I would say that no turbulence model can be totally trusted because there does not exist any unique turbulence model.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buoyancy production for species concentration George Gerber FLUENT 1 May 25, 2006 16:56
Species concentration loss N FLUENT 0 January 12, 2006 12:11
Species concentration at the flow exit Kavitha FLUENT 5 May 28, 2005 07:24
negative species concentration again Andrew Garrard FLUENT 0 March 22, 2005 12:36
mole concentration of species (kmole/m3) neihad@hotmail.com FLUENT 5 August 6, 2003 01:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02.