CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Implicit Large Eddy Simulations

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By truffaldino

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 7, 2011, 09:53
Default Implicit Large Eddy Simulations
  #1
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 235
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
I have recently found out about Implicit LES: The idea of the method is to use LES without subgrid model, i.e. run laminar simulation on a fine grid, which is much coarser than greeds used for DNS.

The justification of the method is based on the fact that energy of the eddies with space size less than l is proportional to l^2/3, so if our problem scale is L and the grid spacing is l, then the unaccounted eddies carry only (l/L)^2/3 part of the turbulent energy (see e.g; http://www.mit.edu/~auranga/presentations/Uranga_presentation-AIAA-2009-SanAntonio.pdf ).

Now, I would like to run flow around an airfoil at Re=50K, the characteristic size of the problem is the boundary layer thikness, which is relatively big at this Re:

Does it mean that I can run Implicit LES for a 3D airfoil, (which, e.g. can be laminar calculation in FLUENT) with grid spacing at foil surface of about 1/50 of the boundary layer size and get reliable results? (y+ for such spacing is order of 1 at this Re)?

People doing ILES claim that numerical error plays role of subgrid model. Will this work with traditional finite-volume schemes implimented in, say Fluent, or this methods needs special numeric schemes.
mm.abdollahzadeh likes this.

Last edited by truffaldino; April 7, 2011 at 11:27.
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2011, 18:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 531
Blog Entries: 14
Rep Power: 17
sbaffini will become famous soon enough
In my experience, it almost always turns out that what you are actually doing in Fluent is ILES, in the sense that the SGS has always a very limited effect, if any.

This is determined by the numerical schemes available, which almost always overwhelmes the SGS part (hence their use is questionable at least).

Are those schemes suitable for ILES? In my opinion NO (neither they are for explicit LES) but the answer can change according to the application (bluff body flows could be best suited for this).

To convince yourself of this just run two simulations, one with a SGS scheme and one without it. Will the difference in results justify the overhead of a SGS model (even if a low one)?

However, the approach to ILES in FLuent is to use a laminar model (which means no turbulence model at all), a suitable convective scheme (bounded central) and a "proper" grid and time steps. What proper means for the grid is application depending, for the time step you need a courant lower than 1 (2 if unavoidable)
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2011, 13:16
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 235
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbaffini View Post
However, the approach to ILES in FLuent is to use a laminar model (which means no turbulence model at all), a suitable convective scheme (bounded central) and a "proper" grid and time steps. What proper means for the grid is application depending, for the time step you need a courant lower than 1 (2 if unavoidable)
Thanks Paolo,

Is the convective scheme you have mentioned (bounded central) is a of Non Oscillatory Finite Volume (NFV) type? As far as I understood one has to use this type of discretization scheme for ILES.

I will be grateful if you could give more info on discretization options to set in Fluent laminar unsteday simulations for run it as ILES.

Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ek for Large Eddy Simulations picouli OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 10, 2008 08:38
Ek for Large Eddy Simulations picouli OpenFOAM Post-Processing 0 October 10, 2008 08:35
Poor convergence of Large eddy simulations DANG Huixue FLUENT 2 October 8, 2008 10:01
Large Eddy Simulations usker CD-adapco 2 May 28, 2008 11:02
Y+ range for Large Eddy simulations Palani FLUENT 1 April 5, 2007 08:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:01.