CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

deforming mesh and freestream preservation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 12, 2011, 02:22
Default deforming mesh and freestream preservation
  #1
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
syoo is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am currently trying to code an 2D Euler-eq solver using the Beam-Warming scheme for a given deforming mesh. So far, I can't preserve freestream using my solver (embarrassing ...) for deforming grids. The freestream is conserved for a non-deforming grid.

My current understanding is that the mesh deformation (mesh velocity) is accounted for in the solution through the Jacobian which transforms the grid from the cartesian coordinate to generalized body-fitted coordinate. I also satisfy the Geometric Conservation Law by calculating the grid metrics written the conservative form, suggested by Thomas and Lombard.

Should I be including the grid velocity in the flux terms? I have went to many literatures that use Beam-Warming scheme and none of them mention this.

Any help, suggestion, or comment will be very much appreciated.

thank you.

-Paul
syoo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2011, 14:11
Default
  #2
agd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 7
agd is on a distinguished road
You need to include the grid velocity terms in the fluxes, since the flux across the face depends on the fluid velocity relative to the face. Additionally, Thomas and Lombard describe a procedure for ensuring geometric conservation when the grid is moving that involves the proper construction of the time derivative of the Jacobian.
agd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2011, 00:05
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
syoo is on a distinguished road
thank you. I'll try it.

-paul
syoo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2011, 11:12
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
syoo is on a distinguished road
I would like some clarification.

I have seen many papers using ALE formulation which includes the grid velocities in the fluxes to accommodate for non-rigidly deforming grids. But I also see papers (ex. Visbal, "On the Use of Higher-ORder Finite-Difference Schemes on Curviilinear and Deforming Meshes") that does not mention including the grid velocities in the flux. In Visbal paper, he uses the same time-implicit method that I use which the Beam-Warming scheme.

so is including the grid velocity necessary? or does Visbal imply that grid velocities are already included in the velocity terms?

thank you.

-Paul
syoo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2011, 12:42
Default
  #5
agd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 7
agd is on a distinguished road
Sorry - I should have been clearer in my original post. The grid velocities are included in the flux terms, but they appear in the form of the grid time metrics (the time derivatives of the grid transformation terms). The Jacobian relationship in Thomas-Lombard connects the time derivative of the Jacobian to the spatial variation of the time metric terms. All of this is necessary for GCL.
agd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
deforming grid, freestream preservation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mesh generation for supersonic flow followed by freestream padmanathan FLUENT 6 September 14, 2010 07:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:55.