Negative Drag in Sweeping motion

aamer · April 16, 2011, 07:00

Hello All....

i am trying to sweep a wing in STILL AIR, from psi = 0 to pi radian in azimuth direction (i.e about global Y- axis). i have written a udf and used DEFINe CG motion macro. the wing is having constant angle of attack of 5 degrees.

In SOLVE>>MOnitor >>Force, i have used X=0, Y=1 for lift and X=1 and Y =0 for drag.... i am getting right Cl curve. the Cd curve starts correctly, but then gives negative values as psi keep increasing.

Wht can be the reasons of negative drag and correct lift values.

aamer · April 16, 2011, 07:01

PLease note that NO turbulance model is used, so Y+ is not an issue. I have tried the cases with smaller time steps, finer grid and bigger domains too..... but no success....

April 16, 2011, 07:00	Negative Drag in Sweeping motion	#1
aamer Member Aamer Shahzad Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 58 Rep Power: 16	Hello All.... i am trying to sweep a wing in STILL AIR, from psi = 0 to pi radian in azimuth direction (i.e about global Y- axis). i have written a udf and used DEFINe CG motion macro. the wing is having constant angle of attack of 5 degrees. In SOLVE>>MOnitor >>Force, i have used X=0, Y=1 for lift and X=1 and Y =0 for drag.... i am getting right Cl curve. the Cd curve starts correctly, but then gives negative values as psi keep increasing. Wht can be the reasons of negative drag and correct lift values.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Airfoil negative drag coefficent	James Forrest	Main CFD Forum	9	September 5, 2022 10:30
Moving mesh	Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	122	June 15, 2014 06:20
channelFoam for a 3D pipe	AlmostSurelyRob	OpenFOAM	3	June 24, 2011 13:06
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning	gaottino	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	7	July 19, 2010 14:11
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh	Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing)	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	10	April 2, 2007 14:00

April 16, 2011, 07:01		#2
aamer Member Aamer Shahzad Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 58 Rep Power: 16	PLease note that NO turbulance model is used, so Y+ is not an issue. I have tried the cases with smaller time steps, finer grid and bigger domains too..... but no success....