Initial condition of isotropic turbulence

March 1, 2005, 05:41

I want to perform direct numerical simulation of isotropic turbulence. But I donot have initial velocity data of turbulence. Do you know initial velocity data which is opened to the public by web, or by something?

krisshoe · June 12, 2012, 12:26

This is what I did when I needed an initial condition. Start by running your forced isotropic turbulence code for a very coarse mesh (say 16^3) until you reach some statistically steady state. Then, use this result as an initial condition for a more refined run (say 32^3). Keep working your way up until you reach the resolution you need for your simulated flow. This bootstrapping approach provided me with a more rapid way to get to a statistically steady state than just starting and running a very high resolution case all the way through.

March 1, 2005, 05:41	Initial condition of isotropic turbulence	#1
Ye Jianying Guest Posts: n/a	I want to perform direct numerical simulation of isotropic turbulence. But I donot have initial velocity data of turbulence. Do you know initial velocity data which is opened to the public by web, or by something?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Compressible Nozzle Flow	sebastian	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	14	September 21, 2016 10:47
ForcesCoeffs	ronaldo	OpenFOAM	4	September 14, 2009 07:11
Problems with simulating TurbFOAM	barath.ezhilan	OpenFOAM	13	July 16, 2009 05:55
Differences between serial and parallel runs	carsten	OpenFOAM Bugs	11	September 12, 2008 11:16
Convergence moving mesh	lr103476	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	30	November 19, 2007 14:09

June 12, 2012, 12:26		#2
krisshoe New Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 14	This is what I did when I needed an initial condition. Start by running your forced isotropic turbulence code for a very coarse mesh (say 16^3) until you reach some statistically steady state. Then, use this result as an initial condition for a more refined run (say 32^3). Keep working your way up until you reach the resolution you need for your simulated flow. This bootstrapping approach provided me with a more rapid way to get to a statistically steady state than just starting and running a very high resolution case all the way through.