CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Implicit steger warming fvs (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/88497-implicit-steger-warming-fvs.html)

pooja May 18, 2011 17:05

Implicit steger warming fvs
 
Hiiii, i am writing code for the implicit steger warming flux vector splitting for 1d cd nozzle case. i am using gmres method to solve Ax = b.
One strange thing is happening with in the code, as all of us know that for implicit there is no restriction on CFL number, First point is that if i start with CFL value 0.1 and max CFL value 2, with incrementation in CFL given by CFL*1.1 my code is converging nicely upto log rss value -7.034528 and results are matching.
But if i am taking max CFL number more than 2 say 4 the its blow up and go for log rss value -1.234 so on or if further increase in max CFL say upto 10 i will get nan after some iteration. I am really getting fed up with it from last one month then one of my friend told that u can put your problem in cfd forum surely you will get nice ideas. All ideas are welcome and thanks in advance plz help me

praveen May 19, 2011 00:10

gmres is not easy to get working for flows with shocks.

From your description I assume you are solving a steady state problem.

You do need to use a smaller cfl to begin with. You can slowly increase this as your residual decreases. So you can try something like

cfl^n = cfl^{n-1} \frac{Res^{n-1}}{Res^n}

You can also put an upper bound on the cfl.

Note that without good preconditioner, gmres will not work.

pooja May 19, 2011 05:34

Thanx parveen for reply, but for 1d cd nozzle case as i said earlier i am starting with a low value of CFl 0.1 and incrementing with CFL*1.01 .
Shall i have to change the iterative method ?

pooja May 19, 2011 06:48

Hey only, one reply from this forum not expected :mad: I am really in very much trouble help me plzzzzzzzzzzz


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:59.