CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   turbulence model for ribbed channel heat transfer (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/88969-turbulence-model-ribbed-channel-heat-transfer.html)

 keryfluid May 31, 2011 09:47

turbulence model for ribbed channel heat transfer

hello everyone,
Recently I've been working on ribbed channel flow,and heat transfer is of great importance in this problem. I found that heat transfer coefficient distribution calculated by the k-e model (with enhanced wall treatment) are not quite satisfying compared to the experimental results. I wonder if there's some logic to guide me to choose a proper turbulence model, or I can only try them one by one?
Your remark are highly appreciated!

 cfd_newbie June 1, 2011 01:40

Quote:
 Originally Posted by keryfluid (Post 309969) hello everyone, Recently I've been working on ribbed channel flow,and heat transfer is of great importance in this problem. I found that heat transfer coefficient distribution calculated by the k-e model (with enhanced wall treatment) are not quite satisfying compared to the experimental results. I wonder if there's some logic to guide me to choose a proper turbulence model, or I can only try them one by one? Your remark are highly appreciated!
hi,
Ribbed channel flow is a very new area to me can you give more details like the Reynolds number involved, details of operating conditions geometry etc. ?
Raashid

 keryfluid June 1, 2011 21:34

Quote:
 Originally Posted by cfd_newbie (Post 310055) hi, Ribbed channel flow is a very new area to me can you give more details like the Reynolds number involved, details of operating conditions geometry etc. ? Raashid
It's a serpentine channel used for internal cooling of gas turbine blade. Reynolds number depend on the hydraulic diameter is around 50,000, rib height is approximately 0.1 Dh, rib pitch is 10 Dh. The channel is square with an aspect ratio from 1/4~4 and it may have a 90-degree or 180-degree turning section. Rotational effects is not considered yet.

 cfd_newbie June 2, 2011 00:16

Quote:
 Originally Posted by keryfluid (Post 310212) It's a serpentine channel used for internal cooling of gas turbine blade. Reynolds number depend on the hydraulic diameter is around 50,000, rib height is approximately 0.1 Dh, rib pitch is 10 Dh. The channel is square with an aspect ratio from 1/4~4 and it may have a 90-degree or 180-degree turning section. Rotational effects is not considered yet.
Did you try the SST turbulence model, this is generally the safest bet and nice starting point. What Y+ are you using right now ? What is the mach number involved ?
Raashid

 keryfluid June 2, 2011 09:53

Quote:
 Originally Posted by cfd_newbie (Post 310223) Did you try the SST turbulence model, this is generally the safest bet and nice starting point. What Y+ are you using right now ? What is the mach number involved ? Raashid
Mach number is near 0.03 so I think it's a incompressible problem. Y+ at most part of the wall is around 3, except for some point on top of the rib ,where yplus can be 10.

 cfd_newbie June 3, 2011 01:02

Quote:
 Originally Posted by keryfluid (Post 310264) Mach number is near 0.03 so I think it's a incompressible problem. Y+ at most part of the wall is around 3, except for some point on top of the rib ,where yplus can be 10.
I think since it's an internal flow than you can increase your mesh count (I hope you have sufficient hardware resources) so that nowhere the Y+ is more than 2. Once you have new finer mesh you can "solve to wall" instead of going for wall functions.

 azt June 3, 2011 06:36

hi

you probably need to go to a low re turbulence model with Y+ around 1, k-w-sst is a good model.

Experience would suggest that the metal temperature is probably being predicted too high. I found this when I did cht analysis on turbine blades. Changing to a low Re model will reduce the metal temperature by around 10 K.

Only problem is you'll need a lot of cells 20 -25 prism layers in the boundary layer

allan

 cfd_newbie June 3, 2011 06:39

Quote:
 Originally Posted by azt (Post 310361) hi you probably need to go to a low re turbulence model with Y+ around 1, k-w-sst is a good model. Experience would suggest that the metal temperature is probably being predicted too high. I found this when I did cht analysis on turbine blades. Changing to a low Re model will reduce the metal temperature by around 10 K. allan
In addition to what Allan has said, if there is a significant laminar to turbulence transition than you should use LMT transition prediction turbulence prediction model.

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:40.